Back to Search
Start Over
Prognostic Factors for Local Control in Breast Cancer After Long-term Follow-up in the EORTC Boost vs No Boost Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Source :
-
JAMA oncology [JAMA Oncol] 2017 Jan 01; Vol. 3 (1), pp. 42-48. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Importance: Prognostic factors of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) may change over time following breast-conserving therapy.<br />Objective: The EORTC "boost no boost" trial showed that young age and high-grade invasive carcinoma were the most important risk factors for IBTR. This study reanalyses pathological prognostic factors related to IBTR using long-term follow-up.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: Participants included 5569 early-stage breast cancer patients, treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and whole-breast irradiation (WBI), who were randomized between no boost and a 16-Gy boost in the EORTC phase III "boost no boost" trial (1989-1996). A total of 1616 patients with a microscopically complete resection (according to local pathologists), included in the central pathology review, have been analyzed in this study. Median follow-up was 18.2 years.<br />Interventions: No further treatment or 16-Gy boost, after BCS and 50-Gy WBI.<br />Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) as first event.<br />Results: The 20-year cumulative incidence of IBTR in 1616 patients (160 events observed) was 15% (95% CI, 12%-17%). Young age (P < .001) and presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.36-3.38; P = .001) were associated with an increased risk of IBTR in multivariable analysis. The cumulative incidence of IBTR at 20 years was 34% (95% CI, 25%-41%), 14% (95% CI, 10%-18%), and 11% (95% CI, 8%-15%), in patients 40 years or younger, 41 to 50 years and 50 years or older, respectively (P < .001). This incidence was 18% (95% CI, 14%-22%) and 9% (95% CI, 6%-12%) for tumors with and without DCIS (P < .001). High-grade tumors relapsed more frequently early during follow-up but the relative effect of age and presence of DCIS seemed stable over time. The boost reduced the 20-year IBTR incidence from 31% (95% CI, 22%-39%) to 15% (95% CI, 8%-21%) (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.62; P < .001) in high-risk patients (≤50 years with DCIS present).<br />Conclusions and Relevance: The association of high-grade invasive tumor with IBTR diminished during follow-up, while the effect of DCIS adjacent to invasive tumor seemed to remain stable. Therefore, patients with high-grade invasive tumors should be monitored closely, especially in the first 5 years, while additional DCIS is an indication for longer follow-up, emphasizing the importance of long-term trial follow-up to estimate absolute effects accurately.<br />Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02295033.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aftercare
Breast Neoplasms drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms pathology
Breast Neoplasms surgery
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating drug therapy
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating pathology
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Mastectomy, Segmental
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness pathology
Neoplasm Staging
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Breast Neoplasms radiotherapy
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating radiotherapy
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology
Prognosis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2374-2445
- Volume :
- 3
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- JAMA oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 27607734
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3031