Back to Search Start Over

Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Authors :
Nelson BC
Wright CW
Ibuki Y
Moreno-Villanueva M
Karlsson HL
Hendriks G
Sims CM
Singh N
Doak SH
Source :
Mutagenesis [Mutagenesis] 2017 Jan; Vol. 32 (1), pp. 215-232. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Aug 26.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

The rapid development of the engineered nanomaterial (ENM) manufacturing industry has accelerated the incorporation of ENMs into a wide variety of consumer products across the globe. Unintentionally or not, some of these ENMs may be introduced into the environment or come into contact with humans or other organisms resulting in unexpected biological effects. It is thus prudent to have rapid and robust analytical metrology in place that can be used to critically assess and/or predict the cytotoxicity, as well as the potential genotoxicity of these ENMs. Many of the traditional genotoxicity test methods [e.g. unscheduled DNA synthesis assay, bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test, etc.,] for determining the DNA damaging potential of chemical and biological compounds are not suitable for the evaluation of ENMs, due to a variety of methodological issues ranging from potential assay interferences to problems centered on low sample throughput. Recently, a number of sensitive, high-throughput genotoxicity assays/platforms (CometChip assay, flow cytometry/micronucleus assay, flow cytometry/γ-H2AX assay, automated 'Fluorimetric Detection of Alkaline DNA Unwinding' (FADU) assay, ToxTracker reporter assay) have been developed, based on substantial modifications and enhancements of traditional genotoxicity assays. These new assays have been used for the rapid measurement of DNA damage (strand breaks), chromosomal damage (micronuclei) and for detecting upregulated DNA damage signalling pathways resulting from ENM exposures. In this critical review, we describe and discuss the fundamental measurement principles and measurement endpoints of these new assays, as well as the modes of operation, analytical metrics and potential interferences, as applicable to ENM exposures. An unbiased discussion of the major technical advantages and limitations of each assay for evaluating and predicting the genotoxic potential of ENMs is also provided.<br /> (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society 2016.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1464-3804
Volume :
32
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Mutagenesis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27565834
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gew037