End-of-Life Discussions with Older Adults.

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of end-of-life (EOL) conversations with older adults.
Design: National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a prospective, longitudinal survey of Medicare beneficiaries.
Setting: Nationally representative.
Participants: A sample drawn from Wave 2 of the NHATS.
Measurements: The main outcome was the report of an EOL planning discussion, based upon the participant's response to the question "Have you talked to anyone about the types of medical treatment you would want or not want if you became seriously ill in the future?"
Results: Sixty-one percent of the sample (n = 1,993 individuals, weighted n = 11,123,910) responded that they had discussed EOL treatment preferences with someone. In multivariate regression, factors associated with reporting an EOL discussion included being younger (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.17-2.47), having more education (high school degree: AOR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.02-2.07; some college: AOR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.40-2.95), and having multiple chronic conditions (AOR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.01-1.55). Black race was associated with lower odds of reporting a discussion (AOR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33-0.65).
Conclusion: Forty percent of a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries had not discussed their preferences regarding EOL medical treatment. Promoting these conversations in clinical and nonclinical settings will be important to ensure that health care is delivered to individuals in a person-centered manner.
Competing Interests: The editor in chief has reviewed the conflict of interest checklist provided by the authors and has determined that the authors have no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper.
(© 2016, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2016, The American Geriatrics Society.)