A review of consent practices and perspectives for pharmacogenetic testing.

Aim: We aimed to understand consent practices for pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing.
Methods: We conducted a literature review and analysis of consent forms from clinical laboratories offering PGx testing.
Results: Our review of the literature shows a lack of consensus about the need for and type of informed consent for PGx testing. We identified 35 companies offering PGx testing and were able to confirm consent practices for 22 of those. We found a range of variability in the consent practices regarding the consent approach and information disclosed.
Conclusion: Variability in the consent practices among laboratories offering PGx testing mirrors the ambiguous practices and recommendations reported in the literature. Establishing a minimal set of information to be disclosed to patients may help address the disparities in consent practice.
Competing Interests: Financial & competing interests disclosure SB Haga serves as a consultant to Mako Medical Laboratories (Raleigh, NC, USA) and the Inova Translational Medicine Institute (Falls Church, VA, USA). The authors are partly supported by the US NIH (1R01GM081416). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.