Back to Search Start Over

Development of West-European PM 2.5 and NO 2 land use regression models incorporating satellite-derived and chemical transport modelling data.

Authors :
de Hoogh K
Gulliver J
Donkelaar AV
Martin RV
Marshall JD
Bechle MJ
Cesaroni G
Pradas MC
Dedele A
Eeftens M
Forsberg B
Galassi C
Heinrich J
Hoffmann B
Jacquemin B
Katsouyanni K
Korek M
Künzli N
Lindley SJ
Lepeule J
Meleux F
de Nazelle A
Nieuwenhuijsen M
Nystad W
Raaschou-Nielsen O
Peters A
Peuch VH
Rouil L
Udvardy O
Slama R
Stempfelet M
Stephanou EG
Tsai MY
Yli-Tuomi T
Weinmayr G
Brunekreef B
Vienneau D
Hoek G
Source :
Environmental research [Environ Res] 2016 Nov; Vol. 151, pp. 1-10. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jul 20.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Satellite-derived (SAT) and chemical transport model (CTM) estimates of PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> and NO <subscript>2</subscript> are increasingly used in combination with Land Use Regression (LUR) models. We aimed to compare the contribution of SAT and CTM data to the performance of LUR PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> and NO <subscript>2</subscript> models for Europe. Four sets of models, all including local traffic and land use variables, were compared (LUR without SAT or CTM, with SAT only, with CTM only, and with both SAT and CTM). LUR models were developed using two monitoring data sets: PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> and NO <subscript>2</subscript> ground level measurements from the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE) and from the European AIRBASE network. LUR PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> models including SAT and SAT+CTM explained ~60% of spatial variation in measured PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> concentrations, substantially more than the LUR model without SAT and CTM (adjR <superscript>2</superscript> : 0.33-0.38). For NO <subscript>2</subscript> CTM improved prediction modestly (adjR <superscript>2</superscript> : 0.58) compared to models without SAT and CTM (adjR <superscript>2</superscript> : 0.47-0.51). Both monitoring networks are capable of producing models explaining the spatial variance over a large study area. SAT and CTM estimates of PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> and NO <subscript>2</subscript> significantly improved the performance of high spatial resolution LUR models at the European scale for use in large epidemiological studies.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1096-0953
Volume :
151
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Environmental research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27447442
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.005