Back to Search Start Over

The 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, "Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda" Diagnostic Testing Breakout Session Report.

Authors :
Barrett TW
Rising KL
Bellolio MF
Hall MK
Brody A
Dodd KW
Grieser M
Levy PD
Raja AS
Self WH
Weingarten G
Hess EP
Hollander JE
Source :
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine [Acad Emerg Med] 2016 Dec; Vol. 23 (12), pp. 1354-1361. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Nov 25.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Diagnostic testing is an integral component of patient evaluation in the emergency department (ED). Emergency clinicians frequently use diagnostic testing to more confidently exclude "worst-case" diagnoses rather than to determine the most likely etiology for a presenting complaint. Increased utilization of diagnostic testing has not been associated with reductions in disease-related mortality but has led to increased overall healthcare costs and other unintended consequences (e.g., incidental findings requiring further workup, unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation or potentially nephrotoxic contrast). Shared decision making (SDM) presents an opportunity for clinicians to discuss the benefits and harms associated with diagnostic testing with patients to more closely tailor testing to patient risk. This article introduces the challenges and opportunities associated with incorporating SDM into emergency care by summarizing the conclusions of the diagnostic testing group at the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on SDM. Three primary domains emerged: 1) characteristics of a condition or test appropriate for SDM, 2) critical elements of and potential barriers to SDM discussions on diagnostic testing, and 3) financial aspects of SDM applied to diagnostic testing. The most critical research questions to improve engagement of patients in their acute care diagnostic decisions were determined by consensus.<br />Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interests/Disclosures: There are no conflicts of interest in connection with this submission nor are there any copyright constraints. No industry financial support or compensation has been or will be received for conducting this study. Barrett: Consultant, Red Bull GmbH, Fuschl am See, Salzburg and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Ridgefield, Connecticut; Research Support as Site Principal Investigator: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Raritan, NJ; Alere, San Diego, CA; Others: None<br /> (© 2016 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1553-2712
Volume :
23
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27404959
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13050