Back to Search Start Over

Downstream resource utilization following SPECT: Impact of age and gender.

Authors :
Zeltser R
Tortez LM
Druz RS
Kozikowski A
Makaryus AN
Lesser M
Pekmezaris R
Source :
Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology [J Nucl Cardiol] 2017 Oct; Vol. 24 (5), pp. 1657-1661. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jun 20.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have identified a downstream referral age and gender bias for invasive coronary anatomy evaluation after single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI). The present study evaluates if such bias still persists despite advancements in SPECT MPI and angiography. We hypothesized that women and patients ≥80 years old are less likely to undergo invasive coronary angiography after adjusting for clinical and scan variables.<br />Methods: Patients (n = 3824) who referred to a nuclear cardiology laboratory at a tertiary medical center were retrospectively identified. Regression analysis tested age (<55; 55-69; 70-79; ≥80 years) and gender as predictors of diagnostic angiogram at 90 days post-SPECT after adjustment for known CAD, CAD risk equivalent, SSS, SDS, and LVEF.<br />Results: Younger patients were more likely to undergo an angiogram as compared to octogenarians (77% more likely if <55 years old, 69% if 55-69 years old, and 52% if 70-79 years old). No effect was found for gender.<br />Conclusions: Older patients were less likely to be referred for angiogram as compared to their younger counterparts. Further study is needed to determine which factors guide this decision-making process in older adults and the influence of these factors on the referral bias.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-6551
Volume :
24
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27324347
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0464-9