Back to Search
Start Over
Trans-fistulary endoscopic drainage for post-bariatric abdominal collections communicating with the upper gastrointestinal tract.
- Source :
-
Endoscopy [Endoscopy] 2016 Sep; Vol. 48 (9), pp. 809-16. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jun 17. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Background and Study Aims: Diverse endoscopic methods, such as placement of temporary self-expandable stents, have proven effective for the treatment of post-bariatric surgery leaks. However, some patients do not respond to the usual endoscopic treatment. This study tested the efficacy of an alternative treatment strategy based on trans-fistulary drainage with double-pigtail plastic stents.<br />Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with abdominal collections following bariatric surgery who were treated by trans-fistulary stenting between May 2007 and February 2015. Clinical success was defined as a sustained (> 4 months) clinical resolution (patient discharged from the hospital without antibiotics and able to resume a normal diet) and radiological response. Patient records, radiological images, and the hospital endoscopy database were reviewed.<br />Results: A total of 33 patients (26 women/7 men, mean age 42 years [SD 11.2]) were included. Collections occurred after sleeve gastrectomy (n = 28) or after gastric bypass (n = 5). Fourteen patients were treated by trans-fistulary stenting as primary treatment, and 19 patients had undergone previous unsuccessful endoscopic treatment. No serious complication occurred during the drainage procedure. Clinical success was achieved in 26 patients (78.8 %). In two successfully treated patients, stents are still in place. Spontaneous stent migration occurred in 12 patients. In 12 patients, the stents were removed, either electively (n = 5) or because of complications (ulcerations n = 3, upper gastrointestinal symptoms n = 3, splenic hematoma n = 1).<br />Conclusions: Trans-fistulary drainage of post-bariatric abdominal collections is safe and associated with high success rates. This technique can be considered in previously untreated patients, when a collection is not properly drained percutaneously, or after failure of other endoscopic treatments.<br /> (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Drainage instrumentation
Female
Gastrectomy adverse effects
Gastric Bypass adverse effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Obesity surgery
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Anastomotic Leak surgery
Digestive System Fistula surgery
Drainage methods
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal methods
Stents adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1438-8812
- Volume :
- 48
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Endoscopy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 27314921
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108726