Back to Search
Start Over
Reduced-Intensity Transplantation for Lymphomas Using Haploidentical Related Donors Versus HLA-Matched Sibling Donors: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Analysis.
- Source :
-
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2016 Sep 10; Vol. 34 (26), pp. 3141-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jun 06. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Related donor haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is increasingly used in patients lacking HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). We compared outcomes after Haplo-HCT using PT-Cy with MSD-HCT in patients with lymphoma, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry.<br />Materials and Methods: We evaluated 987 adult patients undergoing either Haplo-HCT (n = 180) or MSD-HCT (n = 807) following reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. The haploidentical group received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with PT-Cy with or without a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate. The MSD group received calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis.<br />Results: Median follow-up of survivors was 3 years. The 28-day neutrophil recovery was similar in the two groups (95% v 97%; P = .31). The 28-day platelet recovery was delayed in the haploidentical group compared with the MSD group (63% v 91%; P = .001). Cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD at day 100 was similar between the two groups (27% v 25%; P = .84). Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was significantly lower after Haplo-HCT (12% v 45%; P < .001), and this benefit was confirmed on multivariate analysis (relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.31; P < .001). For Haplo-HCT v MSD-HCT, 3-year rates of nonrelapse mortality (15% v 13%; P = .41), relapse/progression (37% v 40%; P = .51), progression-free survival (48% v 48%; P = .96), and overall survival (61% v 62%; P = .82) were similar. Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference between Haplo-HCT and MSD-HCT in terms of nonrelapse mortality (P = .06), progression/relapse (P = .10), progression-free survival (P = .83), and overall survival (P = .34).<br />Conclusion: Haplo-HCT with PT-Cy provides survival outcomes comparable to MSD-HCT, with a significantly lower risk of chronic GVHD.<br />Competing Interests: Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article.<br /> (© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Calcineurin Inhibitors administration & dosage
Cyclophosphamide adverse effects
Disease-Free Survival
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Graft Rejection immunology
Graft Rejection prevention & control
Graft Survival drug effects
Graft vs Host Disease immunology
Graft vs Host Disease prevention & control
HLA Antigens immunology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation mortality
Histocompatibility Testing
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents adverse effects
Lymphoma genetics
Lymphoma immunology
Lymphoma mortality
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Proportional Hazards Models
Recurrence
Registries
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Transplantation Conditioning adverse effects
Transplantation Conditioning mortality
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage
HLA Antigens genetics
Haploidy
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation methods
Histocompatibility
Immunosuppressive Agents administration & dosage
Lymphoma surgery
Siblings
Tissue Donors
Transplantation Conditioning methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1527-7755
- Volume :
- 34
- Issue :
- 26
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 27269951
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.66.3476