Back to Search Start Over

Genomic and archaeological evidence suggest a dual origin of domestic dogs.

Authors :
Frantz LA
Mullin VE
Pionnier-Capitan M
Lebrasseur O
Ollivier M
Perri A
Linderholm A
Mattiangeli V
Teasdale MD
Dimopoulos EA
Tresset A
Duffraisse M
McCormick F
Bartosiewicz L
Gál E
Nyerges ÉA
Sablin MV
Bréhard S
Mashkour M
Bălăşescu A
Gillet B
Hughes S
Chassaing O
Hitte C
Vigne JD
Dobney K
Hänni C
Bradley DG
Larson G
Source :
Science (New York, N.Y.) [Science] 2016 Jun 03; Vol. 352 (6290), pp. 1228-31. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jun 02.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

The geographic and temporal origins of dogs remain controversial. We generated genetic sequences from 59 ancient dogs and a complete (28x) genome of a late Neolithic dog (dated to ~4800 calendar years before the present) from Ireland. Our analyses revealed a deep split separating modern East Asian and Western Eurasian dogs. Surprisingly, the date of this divergence (~14,000 to 6400 years ago) occurs commensurate with, or several millennia after, the first appearance of dogs in Europe and East Asia. Additional analyses of ancient and modern mitochondrial DNA revealed a sharp discontinuity in haplotype frequencies in Europe. Combined, these results suggest that dogs may have been domesticated independently in Eastern and Western Eurasia from distinct wolf populations. East Eurasian dogs were then possibly transported to Europe with people, where they partially replaced European Paleolithic dogs.<br /> (Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1095-9203
Volume :
352
Issue :
6290
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Science (New York, N.Y.)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27257259
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3161