Back to Search Start Over

Follow-up after focal therapy in renal masses: an international multidisciplinary Delphi consensus project.

Authors :
Zondervan PJ
Wagstaff PG
Desai MM
de Bruin DM
Fraga AF
Hadaschik BA
Köllermann J
Liehr UB
Pahernik SA
Schlemmer HP
Wendler JJ
Algaba F
de la Rosette JJ
Laguna Pes MP
Source :
World journal of urology [World J Urol] 2016 Dec; Vol. 34 (12), pp. 1657-1665. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Apr 22.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Purpose: To establish consensus on follow-up (FU) after focal therapy (FT) in renal masses. To formulate recommendations to aid in clinical practice and research.<br />Methods: Key topics and questions for consensus were identified from a systematic literature research. A Web-based questionnaire was distributed among participants selected based on their contribution to the literature and/or known expertise. Three rounds according to the Delphi method were performed online. Final discussion was conducted during the "8th International Symposium on Focal Therapy and Imaging in Prostate and Kidney Cancer" among an international multidisciplinary expert panel.<br />Results: Sixty-two participants completed all three rounds of the online questionnaire. The panel recommended a minimum follow-up of 5 years, preferably extended to 10 years. The first FU was recommended at 3 months, with at least two imaging studies in the first year. Imaging was recommended biannually during the second year and annually thereafter. The panel recommended FU by means of CT scan with slice thickness ≤3 mm (at least three phases with excretory phase if suspicion of collecting system involvement) or mpMRI. Annual checkup for pulmonary metastasis by CT thorax was advised. Outside study protocols, biopsy during follow-up should only be performed in case of suspicion of residual/persistent disease or radiological recurrence.<br />Conclusions: The consensus led to clear FU recommendations after FT of renal masses supported by a multidisciplinary expert panel. In spite of the low level of evidence, these recommendations can guide clinicians and create uniformity in the follow-up practice and for clinical research purposes.<br />Competing Interests: All authors of this manuscript declare no conflict of interest. Ethical standards All human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1433-8726
Volume :
34
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
World journal of urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27106492
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1828-0