Back to Search Start Over

Proposed radiological criteria for pre-operative determination of resectability in peritoneal-based malignancies.

Authors :
Tan GH
Kwek JW
Hosseini R
Chanyaputhipong J
Tham CK
Soo KC
Teo MC
Source :
Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology [J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol] 2016 Jun; Vol. 60 (3), pp. 337-43. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Apr 21.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: The selection of patients for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy infusion (HIPEC) is important, and relies heavily on imaging. However, it has been reported that Computer Tomographic (CT) scans may only achieve a low sensitivity of 33% for peritoneal disease. We propose a set of radiological criteria for pre-operative determination of resectability of peritoneal disease in peritoneal-based malignancies and validate this in our cohort of patients.<br />Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparotomy with a view for CRS and HIPEC, at the National Cancer Centre Singapore from January 2000 to April 2010, was performed. Intra-operative Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) scores were recorded. The pre-operative imaging was reviewed with a senior radiologist who was blinded, and recorded the radiological PCI scores (CT-PCI) and eight additional CT prognostic factors (CT-PF). The CT-PCI and CT-PF scores were then compared with the intra-operative findings to determine the radiological accuracy. The scores and the individual prognostic factors were then evaluated for their predictive ability for unresectability.<br />Results: Comparison of the CT-PCI and PCI scores showed a concordance correlation coefficient at 0.52 (95% CI 0.34-0.7). Accuracy was increased with the addition CT-PF. The presence of omental caking and ascites were predictors of unresectability. We propose a scoring system which is able to predict for unresectable disease with a specificity of 80% and a sensitivity of 62%.<br />Conclusion: With our proposed criteria, and scoring system, the selection of patients for CRS and HIPEC can be improved, and unnecessary exploratory operations avoided.<br /> (© 2016 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1754-9485
Volume :
60
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27098828
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12456