Back to Search Start Over

Clinical outcomes following sublaminar decompression and instrumented fusion for lumbar degenerative spinal pathology.

Authors :
Peddada K
Elder BD
Ishida W
Lo SL
Goodwin CR
Boah AO
Witham TF
Source :
Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia [J Clin Neurosci] 2016 Aug; Vol. 30, pp. 98-104. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Apr 04.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Traditional treatment for lumbar stenosis with instability is laminectomy and posterolateral arthrodesis, with or without interbody fusion. However, laminectomies remove the posterior elements and decrease the available surface area for fusion. Therefore, a sublaminar decompression may be a preferred approach for adequate decompression while preserving bone surface area for fusion. A retrospective review of 71 patients who underwent sublaminar decompression in conjunction with instrumented fusion for degenerative spinal disorders at a single institution was performed. Data collected included demographics, preoperative symptoms, operative data, and radiographical measurements of the central canal, lateral recesses, and neural foramina, and fusion outcomes. Paired t-tests were used to test significance of the outcomes. Thirty-one males and 40 females with a median age 60years underwent sublaminar decompression and fusion. A median of two levels were fused. The mean Visual Analog Scale pain score improved from 6.7 preoperatively to 2.9 at last follow-up. The fusion rate was 88%, and the median time to fusion was 11months. Preoperative and postoperative mean thecal sac cross-sectional area, right lateral recess height, left lateral recess height, right foraminal diameter, and left foraminal diameter were 153 and 209mm(2) (p<0.001), 5.9 and 5.9mm (p=0.43), 5.8 and 6.3mm (p=0.027), 4.6 and 5.2mm (p=0.008), and 4.2 and 5.2mm (p<0.001), respectively. Sublaminar decompression provided adequate decompression, with significant increases in thecal sac cross-sectional area and bilateral foraminal diameter. It may be an effective alternative to laminectomy in treating central and foraminal stenosis in conjunction with instrumented fusion.<br /> (Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-2653
Volume :
30
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27056673
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.02.001