Back to Search Start Over

Measurement invariance across administration mode: Examining the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist.

Authors :
Boal AL
Vaughan CA
Sims CS
Miles JN
Source :
Psychological assessment [Psychol Assess] 2017 Jan; Vol. 29 (1), pp. 76-86. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Apr 07.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist (PCL) is commonly used to screen for PTSD in clinical and research contexts. While the PCL is utilized within numerous settings and populations, research has not yet established the extent to which individuals respond similarly across different modes of administration. The use of both telephone and web survey administration modes has numerous potential benefits, including data quality improvement, but may introduce an additional source of measurement error. The current study examined the psychometric properties, including factor structure and measurement invariance, of the PCL across telephone and web administration modes among 455 wounded, ill, or injured airmen who were medically retired or undergoing evaluation for disability caused by injuries and illnesses of a physical or psychological nature. Findings suggest the properties of the PCL were invariant with regard to the mode of administration, such that the overall scale structure and size of the loadings were similar across groups. Corrections were applied to the computation of probable PTSD diagnosis to account for partial scalar invariance. The lack of complete invariance did not affect probable PTSD diagnosis. Finally, differences in latent means across the telephone and web group were nonsignificant and modest in magnitude. These results indicate that although the PCL only achieved partial scalar invariance across administration modes, the practical impact of this difference on rates of probable PTSD is negligible. The practical benefits of administering the PCL over the telephone and on the web do not appear to be outweighed by the potential cost of additional measurement error. (PsycINFO Database Record<br /> ((c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1939-134X
Volume :
29
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Psychological assessment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27054619
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000301