Back to Search Start Over

Usefulness of Baltasar's expected body mass index as an indicator of bariatric weight loss surgery.

Authors :
Molina López A
Sabench Pereferrer F
Vives Espelta M
Bonada Sanjaume A
Blanco Blasco S
Raga Carceller E
Hernández González M
Sánchez Marín A
Salas Salvadó J
Del Castillo Déjardin D
Source :
Obesity surgery [Obes Surg] 2016 Nov; Vol. 26 (11), pp. 2712-2717.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Introduction: Determining the best indicator to report weight loss takes on special relevance following bariatric surgery. Our objective is to apply a method proposed by Baltasar et al. to express weight loss results following bariatric surgery.<br />Materials and Methods: Anthropometric data were collected from 265 patients who had undergone Sleeve gastrectomy (SG, n = 172) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP, n = 93) with a 2-year follow-up period. Initial BMI was calculated as well as BMI 2 years after, percentage of excess BMI loss (PEBMIL), expected BMI (EBMI), and corrected PEBMIL.<br />Results: In SG group, average BMI 2 years after surgery fell within a 95 % CI of expected BMI, with an average BMI of 31.58 ± 4.05 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> in 35-45 BMI group, an average BMI of 33.62 ± 4.96 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> in 45-55 BMI group, and an average BMI of 37.40 ± 5.93 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> in 55-65 BMI group. In RYGBP group, average BMI 2 years after the surgery was below than average expected BMI (28.76 ± 3.20 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> in 35-45 BMI group and 29.71 ± 3.30 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> in 45-55 BMI group). Results are considered excellent for the group with an initial BMI of above 45 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> .<br />Conclusions: EBMI is a good weight loss indicator, mainly when 95 % CI is taken into account. EBMI is consistent with the results obtained 2 years after surgery in our patients who underwent SG and RYGBP. Corrected PEBMIL is a good indicator for expressing the percentage of BMI loss and offers more realistic values than conventional formula with a cut-off point of 25 points.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1708-0428
Volume :
26
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Obesity surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27039101
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2163-7