Back to Search Start Over

Sutureless Versus Stented Valve in Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Annulus.

Authors :
Shalabi A
Spiegelstein D
Sternik L
Feinberg MS
Kogan A
Levin S
Orlov B
Nachum E
Lipey A
Raanani E
Source :
The Annals of thoracic surgery [Ann Thorac Surg] 2016 Jul; Vol. 102 (1), pp. 118-22. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Mar 23.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: Aortic valve replacement, particularly in elderly patients with small aortic annulus, could lead to patient-prosthesis mismatch. Sutureless bioprosthesis could be an ideal solution for these patients. We compared results of aortic valve replacement with sutureless versus stented bioprosthetic valves.<br />Methods: Of the 63 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with sutureless bioprosthesis between 2011 and 2014 in our department, 22 (20 women, 77 ± 6 years) had a small annulus less than 21 mm (sutureless group). They were matched for sex, age, body surface area, and left ventricular ejection fraction with 22 patients (20 women, 79 ± 6 years) undergoing stented bioprosthesis valve replacement (stented group). Body mass index and body surface area were 28 ± 5 kg/m(2) and 28 ± 3 kg/m(2) (p = 0.9), 1.6 ± 0.2 m(2) and 1.6 ± 0.1 m(2) (p = 0.9), in the sutureless and stented groups, respectively. Logistic EuroSCOREs were similar between groups.<br />Results: Postoperative peak transvalvular gradient was lower in the sutureless group (15 ± 7 mm Hg versus 20 ± 11 mm Hg; p = 0.02). The indexed effective orifice area was greater in the sutureless group (1.12 ± 0.2 cm(2)/m(2) versus 0.82 ± 0.1 cm(2)/m(2); p < 0.05). Aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 47 ± 21 and 67 ± 15 minutes, respectively (p < 0.05) in the sutureless group versus 70 ± 22 and 85 ± 21 minutes, respectively (p = 0.02) in the stented group. Intensive care unit stay, hospitalization, and major complications were not significantly different between groups. At follow-up, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy was better in the sutureless group (93 ± 21 g/m(2) versus 106 ± 14 g/m(2); p = 0.02).<br />Conclusions: Sutureless bioprosthetic valves demonstrate improved hemodynamic performance compared with stented valves in elderly patients with small aortic annulus, providing better regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and decreased rates of patient-prosthesis mismatch. Aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times are also decreased.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1552-6259
Volume :
102
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Annals of thoracic surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27016426
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.003