Back to Search
Start Over
Is Bare-Metal Stent Implantation Still Justifiable in High Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?: A Pre-Specified Analysis From the ZEUS Trial.
- Source :
-
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions [JACC Cardiovasc Interv] 2016 Mar 14; Vol. 9 (5), pp. 426-36. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Objectives: This study sought to investigate the ischemic and bleeding outcomes of patients fulfilling high bleeding risk (HBR) criteria who were randomized to zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Sprint stent (E-ZES) or bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation followed by an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration for stable or unstable coronary artery disease.<br />Background: DES instead of BMS use remains controversial in HBR patients, in whom long-term DAPT poses safety concerns.<br />Methods: The ZEUS (Zotarolimus-Eluting Endeavor Sprint Stent in Uncertain DES Candidates) is a multinational, randomized single-blinded trial that randomized among others, in a stratified manner, 828 patients fulfilling pre-defined clinical or biochemical HBR criteria-including advanced age, indication to oral anticoagulants or other pro-hemorrhagic medications, history of bleeding and known anemia-to receive E-ZES or BMS followed by a protocol-mandated 30-day DAPT regimen. The primary endpoint of the study was the 12-month major adverse cardiovascular event rate, consisting of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.<br />Results: Compared with patients without, those with 1 or more HBR criteria had worse outcomes, owing to higher ischemic and bleeding risks. Among HBR patients, major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 22.6% of the E-ZES and 29% of the BMS patients (hazard ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 0.98; p = 0.033), driven by lower myocardial infarction (3.5% vs. 10.4%; p < 0.001) and target vessel revascularization (5.9% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.005) rates in the E-ZES arm. The composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis was significantly reduced in E-ZES recipients, whereas bleeding events did not differ between stent groups.<br />Conclusions: Among HBR patients with stable or unstable coronary artery disease, E-ZES implantation provides superior efficacy and safety as compared with conventional BMS. (Zotarolimus-Eluting Endeavor Sprint Stent in Uncertain DES Candidates [ZEUS]; NCT01385319).<br /> (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiovascular Agents administration & dosage
Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging
Coronary Artery Disease mortality
Drug Therapy, Combination
Drug-Eluting Stents
Female
Hemorrhage mortality
Humans
Male
Myocardial Infarction etiology
Patient Selection
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention mortality
Prosthesis Design
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Single-Blind Method
Sirolimus administration & dosage
Sirolimus analogs & derivatives
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Coronary Artery Disease therapy
Hemorrhage chemically induced
Metals
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention instrumentation
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors adverse effects
Stents
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1876-7605
- Volume :
- 9
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26965932
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.11.015