Back to Search Start Over

Validation of a classification system for causes of death in critical care: an assessment of inter-rater reliability.

Authors :
Ridgeon E
Bellomo R
Myburgh J
Saxena M
Weatherall M
Jahan R
Arawwawala D
Bell S
Butt W
Camsooksai J
Carle C
Cheng A
Cirstea E
Cohen J
Cranshaw J
Delaney A
Eastwood G
Eliott S
Franke U
Gantner D
Green C
Howard-Griffin R
Inskip D
Litton E
MacIsaac C
McCairn A
Mahambrey T
Moondi P
Newby L
O'Connor S
Pegg C
Pope A
Reschreiter H
Richards B
Robertson M
Rodgers H
Shehabi Y
Smith I
Smith J
Smith N
Tilsley A
Whitehead C
Willett E
Wong K
Woodford C
Wright S
Young P
Source :
Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine [Crit Care Resusc] 2016 Mar; Vol. 18 (1), pp. 50-4.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Objective: Trials in critical care have previously used unvalidated systems to classify cause of death. We aimed to provide initial validation of a method to classify cause of death in intensive care unit patients.<br />Design, Setting and Participants: One hundred case scenarios of patients who died in an ICU were presented online to raters, who were asked to select a proximate and an underlying cause of death for each, using the ICU Deaths Classification and Reason (ICU-DECLARE) system. We evaluated two methods of categorising proximate cause of death (designated Lists A and B) and one method of categorising underlying cause of death. Raters were ICU specialists and research coordinators from Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Inter-rater reliability, as measured by the Fleiss multirater kappa, and the median proportion of raters choosing the most likely diagnosis (defined as the most popular classification choice in each case).<br />Results: Across all raters and cases, for proximate cause of death List A, kappa was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.49-0.60), and for proximate cause of death List B, kappa was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.53-0.63). For the underlying cause of death, kappa was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.44-0.53). The median proportion of raters choosing the most likely diagnosis for proximate cause of death, List A, was 77.5% (interquartile range [IQR], 60.0%-93.8%), and the median proportion choosing the most likely diagnosis for proximate cause of death, List B, was 82.5% (IQR, 60.0%-92.5%). The median proportion choosing the most likely diagnosis for underlying cause was 65.0% (IQR, 50.0%-81.3%). Kappa and median agreement were similar between countries. ICU specialists showed higher kappa and median agreement than research coordinators.<br />Conclusions: The ICU-DECLARE system allowed ICU doctors to classify the proximate cause of death of patients who died in the ICU with substantial reliability.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1441-2772
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26947416