Back to Search Start Over

Trial Design and Objectives for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3.

Authors :
Scher HI
Morris MJ
Stadler WM
Higano C
Basch E
Fizazi K
Antonarakis ES
Beer TM
Carducci MA
Chi KN
Corn PG
de Bono JS
Dreicer R
George DJ
Heath EI
Hussain M
Kelly WK
Liu G
Logothetis C
Nanus D
Stein MN
Rathkopf DE
Slovin SF
Ryan CJ
Sartor O
Small EJ
Smith MR
Sternberg CN
Taplin ME
Wilding G
Nelson PS
Schwartz LH
Halabi S
Kantoff PW
Armstrong AJ
Source :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2016 Apr 20; Vol. 34 (12), pp. 1402-18. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Feb 22.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Purpose: Evolving treatments, disease phenotypes, and biology, together with a changing drug development environment, have created the need to revise castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) clinical trial recommendations to succeed those from prior Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Groups.<br />Methods: An international expert committee of prostate cancer clinical investigators (the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 [PCWG3]) was reconvened and expanded and met in 2012-2015 to formulate updated criteria on the basis of emerging trial data and validation studies of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 recommendations.<br />Results: PCWG3 recommends that baseline patient assessment include tumor histology, detailed records of prior systemic treatments and responses, and a detailed reporting of disease subtypes based on an anatomic pattern of metastatic spread. New recommendations for trial outcome measures include the time to event end point of symptomatic skeletal events, as well as time to first metastasis and time to progression for trials in the nonmetastatic CRPC state. PCWG3 introduces the concept of no longer clinically benefiting to underscore the distinction between first evidence of progression and the clinical need to terminate or change treatment, and the importance of documenting progression in existing lesions as distinct from the development of new lesions. Serial biologic profiling using tumor samples from biopsies, blood-based diagnostics, and/or imaging is also recommended to gain insight into mechanisms of resistance and to identify predictive biomarkers of sensitivity for use in prospective trials.<br />Conclusion: PCWG3 moves drug development closer to unmet needs in clinical practice by focusing on disease manifestations most likely to affect prognosis adversely for therapeutics tested in both nonmetastatic and metastatic CRPC populations. Consultation with regulatory authorities is recommended if a trial is intended to seek support for drug approval.<br /> (© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-7755
Volume :
34
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26903579
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2702