Back to Search
Start Over
Trial Design and Objectives for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3.
- Source :
-
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2016 Apr 20; Vol. 34 (12), pp. 1402-18. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Feb 22. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Evolving treatments, disease phenotypes, and biology, together with a changing drug development environment, have created the need to revise castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) clinical trial recommendations to succeed those from prior Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Groups.<br />Methods: An international expert committee of prostate cancer clinical investigators (the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 [PCWG3]) was reconvened and expanded and met in 2012-2015 to formulate updated criteria on the basis of emerging trial data and validation studies of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 recommendations.<br />Results: PCWG3 recommends that baseline patient assessment include tumor histology, detailed records of prior systemic treatments and responses, and a detailed reporting of disease subtypes based on an anatomic pattern of metastatic spread. New recommendations for trial outcome measures include the time to event end point of symptomatic skeletal events, as well as time to first metastasis and time to progression for trials in the nonmetastatic CRPC state. PCWG3 introduces the concept of no longer clinically benefiting to underscore the distinction between first evidence of progression and the clinical need to terminate or change treatment, and the importance of documenting progression in existing lesions as distinct from the development of new lesions. Serial biologic profiling using tumor samples from biopsies, blood-based diagnostics, and/or imaging is also recommended to gain insight into mechanisms of resistance and to identify predictive biomarkers of sensitivity for use in prospective trials.<br />Conclusion: PCWG3 moves drug development closer to unmet needs in clinical practice by focusing on disease manifestations most likely to affect prognosis adversely for therapeutics tested in both nonmetastatic and metastatic CRPC populations. Consultation with regulatory authorities is recommended if a trial is intended to seek support for drug approval.<br /> (© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)
- Subjects :
- Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects
Biomarkers, Tumor blood
Biomarkers, Tumor genetics
Biopsy
Consensus
Diagnostic Imaging
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Humans
Kallikreins blood
Male
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
Phenotype
Predictive Value of Tests
Prostate-Specific Antigen blood
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant blood
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant genetics
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant pathology
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use
Clinical Trials as Topic standards
Drug Approval
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant drug therapy
Research Design standards
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1527-7755
- Volume :
- 34
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26903579
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2702