Back to Search Start Over

Genetic predisposition to ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors :
Petridis C
Brook MN
Shah V
Kohut K
Gorman P
Caneppele M
Levi D
Papouli E
Orr N
Cox A
Cross SS
Dos-Santos-Silva I
Peto J
Swerdlow A
Schoemaker MJ
Bolla MK
Wang Q
Dennis J
Michailidou K
Benitez J
González-Neira A
Tessier DC
Vincent D
Li J
Figueroa J
Kristensen V
Borresen-Dale AL
Soucy P
Simard J
Milne RL
Giles GG
Margolin S
Lindblom A
Brüning T
Brauch H
Southey MC
Hopper JL
Dörk T
Bogdanova NV
Kabisch M
Hamann U
Schmutzler RK
Meindl A
Brenner H
Arndt V
Winqvist R
Pylkäs K
Fasching PA
Beckmann MW
Lubinski J
Jakubowska A
Mulligan AM
Andrulis IL
Tollenaar RA
Devilee P
Le Marchand L
Haiman CA
Mannermaa A
Kosma VM
Radice P
Peterlongo P
Marme F
Burwinkel B
van Deurzen CH
Hollestelle A
Miller N
Kerin MJ
Lambrechts D
Floris G
Wesseling J
Flyger H
Bojesen SE
Yao S
Ambrosone CB
Chenevix-Trench G
Truong T
Guénel P
Rudolph A
Chang-Claude J
Nevanlinna H
Blomqvist C
Czene K
Brand JS
Olson JE
Couch FJ
Dunning AM
Hall P
Easton DF
Pharoah PD
Pinder SE
Schmidt MK
Tomlinson I
Roylance R
García-Closas M
Sawyer EJ
Source :
Breast cancer research : BCR [Breast Cancer Res] 2016 Feb 17; Vol. 18 (1), pp. 22. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Feb 17.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive form of breast cancer. It is often associated with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and is considered to be a non-obligate precursor of IDC. It is not clear to what extent these two forms of cancer share low-risk susceptibility loci, or whether there are differences in the strength of association for shared loci.<br />Methods: To identify genetic polymorphisms that predispose to DCIS, we pooled data from 38 studies comprising 5,067 cases of DCIS, 24,584 cases of IDC and 37,467 controls, all genotyped using the iCOGS chip.<br />Results: Most (67 %) of the 76 known breast cancer predisposition loci showed an association with DCIS in the same direction as previously reported for invasive breast cancer. Case-only analysis showed no evidence for differences between associations for IDC and DCIS after considering multiple testing. Analysis by estrogen receptor (ER) status confirmed that loci associated with ER positive IDC were also associated with ER positive DCIS. Analysis of DCIS by grade suggested that two independent SNPs at 11q13.3 near CCND1 were specific to low/intermediate grade DCIS (rs75915166, rs554219). These associations with grade remained after adjusting for ER status and were also found in IDC. We found no novel DCIS-specific loci at a genome wide significance level of P < 5.0x10(-8).<br />Conclusion: In conclusion, this study provides the strongest evidence to date of a shared genetic susceptibility for IDC and DCIS. Studies with larger numbers of DCIS are needed to determine if IDC or DCIS specific loci exist.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1465-542X
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Breast cancer research : BCR
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26884359
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0675-7