Back to Search
Start Over
Prevalence and predictor factors of severe venous obstruction after cardiovascular electronic device implantation.
- Source :
-
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology [Europace] 2016 Aug; Vol. 18 (8), pp. 1220-6. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Dec 24. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Aims: Despite not being uncommon, limited evidence exists about predisposing factors for venous obstruction in patients with implantable electronic devices. We aimed to assess the prevalence of severe venous obstruction in patients with intravenous devices and identify predictor factors.<br />Methods and Results: A total of 184 patients underwent venography to detect venous obstruction associated with the inserted lead. Vessel obstruction was graded as venous occlusion (complete flow interruption), severe obstruction (narrowing >90%), or mild-moderate obstruction (narrowing 50-90%). Severe venous obstruction/occlusion prevalence was 11.4% (n = 21) and was always asymptomatic. Collateral circulation was found in 80.9% of patients with severe obstruction/occlusion. Twelve patients (6.5%) had 3 leads. The rates of patients with secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death as indication for implantable devices and of those of patients with 3 leads were significantly greater in the group with severe obstruction/occlusion than in the non-severe obstruction/occlusion group (respectively, P = 0.004 and P = 0.03). Logistic analysis adjusted for venous thromboembolic risk factors confirmed that secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death as indication for implantable devices [odds ratio (OR), 7.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-35.3; P = 0.017] and the presence of 3 leads (OR, 8.5; 95% CI: 1.75-41.35; P = 0.008) were predictors of severe obstruction/occlusion.<br />Conclusion: In patients with implantable devices, severe venous obstruction prevalence is not negligible and the lack of symptoms does not exclude it. The presence of three leads and sudden cardiac death as indication for implantable devices seem to be associated with the presence of severe venous obstruction/occlusion.<br /> (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Death, Sudden, Cardiac prevention & control
Female
Humans
Italy
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Phlebography
Postoperative Complications diagnostic imaging
Risk Factors
Venous Thromboembolism diagnostic imaging
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy adverse effects
Defibrillators, Implantable adverse effects
Pacemaker, Artificial adverse effects
Postoperative Complications epidemiology
Venous Thromboembolism epidemiology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-2092
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26705557
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv391