Back to Search Start Over

Incidence of arrhythmias in a large cohort of patients with current implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in Spain: results from the UMBRELLA Registry.

Authors :
Fontenla A
Martínez-Ferrer JB
Alzueta J
Viñolas X
García-Alberola A
Brugada J
Peinado R
Sancho-Tello MJ
Cano A
Fernández-Lozano I
Source :
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology [Europace] 2016 Nov; Vol. 18 (11), pp. 1726-1734. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Dec 24.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Aims: The benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in patients at risk of sudden death has been established in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using the ICD models available at the time. However, observational large-scale data on the incidence of arrhythmias in up-to-date ICDs implanted according to the current guidelines are scarce. The aim was to assess the incidence of arrhythmias in a large, current ICD population based on a blinded peer review of the detected episodes.<br />Methods and Results: UMBRELLA is a multicentre, observational registry of ICD patients followed by remote monitoring. Stored episodes were classified by a blinded committee of experts. Subgroup analyses were based on clinical profiles established by previous pivotal RCTs of ICDs. Of 1514 enrolled patients, 605 (39.9%) patients had 5951 episodes after 26 ± 17 months follow-up, being 3353 of them (56.3%) sustained ventricular arrhythmias (SVA), and 13.2% of SVA were self-terminated. Appropriate and inappropriate shocks occurred in 11.6 and 5% of patients, respectively. The 3 years cumulative incidence of SVA was 25% (95% CI: 21-28%) in primary prevention patients and 41% (95% CI: 36-47%) in secondary prevention patients (P < 0.001). Male gender, secondary prevention, and atrial fibrillation as basal rhythm were significantly related to a higher incidence of SVA.<br />Conclusion: This real-world analysis suggests that modern ICD patients have a low rate of appropriate and inappropriate shocks. The risk of SVA in secondary prevention patients is less than what has been reported in RCTs.<br /> (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-2092
Volume :
18
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26705555
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv393