Back to Search
Start Over
Prospective Validation of Pooled Prognostic Factors in Women with Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy with/without Bevacizumab: NRG Oncology/GOG Study.
- Source :
-
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research [Clin Cancer Res] 2015 Dec 15; Vol. 21 (24), pp. 5480-7. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Purpose: In the randomized phase III trial, Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocol 240, the incorporation of bevacizumab with chemotherapy significantly increased overall survival (OS) in women with advanced cervical cancer. A major objective of GOG-240 was to prospectively analyze previously identified pooled clinical prognostic factors known as the Moore criteria.<br />Experimental Design: Potential negative factors included black race, performance status 1, pelvic disease, prior cisplatin, and progression-free interval <365 days. Risk categories included low-risk (0-1 factor), mid-risk (2-3 factors), and high-risk (4-5 factors). Each test of association was conducted at the 5% level of significance. Logistic regression and survival analysis was used to determine whether factors were prognostic or could be used to guide therapy.<br />Results: For the entire population (n = 452), high-risk patients had significantly worse OS (P < 0.0001). The HRs of death for treating with topotecan in low-risk, mid-risk, and high-risk subsets are 1.18 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-2.24], 1.11 (95% CI, 0.82-1.5), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.50-1.42), respectively. The HRs of death for treating with bevacizumab in low-risk, mid-risk, and high-risk subsets are 0.96 (95% CI, 0.51-1.83; P = 0.9087), 0.673 (95% CI, 0.5-0.91; P = 0.0094), and 0.536 (95% CI, 0.32-0.905; P = 0.0196), respectively.<br />Conclusions: This is the first prospectively validated scoring system in cervical cancer. The Moore criteria have real-world clinical applicability. Toxicity concerns may justify omission of bevacizumab in some low-risk patients where survival benefit is small. The benefit to receiving bevacizumab appears to be greatest in the moderate- and high-risk subgroups (5.8-month increase in median OS). Clin Cancer Res; 21(24); 5480-7. ©2015 AACR.<br /> (©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.)
- Subjects :
- Bevacizumab administration & dosage
Cisplatin administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Neoplasm Staging
Odds Ratio
Paclitaxel administration & dosage
Prognosis
Survival Analysis
Topotecan administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms mortality
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms drug therapy
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms pathology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1557-3265
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 24
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26672085
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1346