Back to Search Start Over

Lipidomics comparing DCD and DBD liver allografts uncovers lysophospholipids elevated in recipients undergoing early allograft dysfunction.

Authors :
Xu J
Casas-Ferreira AM
Ma Y
Sen A
Kim M
Proitsi P
Shkodra M
Tena M
Srinivasan P
Heaton N
Jassem W
Legido-Quigley C
Source :
Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2015 Dec 04; Vol. 5, pp. 17737. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Dec 04.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Finding specific biomarkers of liver damage in clinical evaluations could increase the pool of available organs for transplantation. Lipids are key regulators in cell necrosis and hence this study hypothesised that lipid levels could be altered in organs suffering severe ischemia. Matched pre- and post-transplant biopsies from donation after circulatory death (DCD, n = 36, mean warm ischemia time = 2 min) and donation after brain death (DBD, n = 76, warm ischemia time = none) were collected. Lipidomic discovery and multivariate analysis (MVA) were applied. Afterwards, univariate analysis and clinical associations were conducted for selected lipids differentiating between these two groups. MVA grouped DCD vs. DBD (p = 6.20 × 10(-12)) and 12 phospholipids were selected for intact lipid measurements. Two lysophosphatidylcholines, LysoPC (16:0) and LysoPC (18:0), showed higher levels in DCD at pre-transplantation (q < 0.01). Lysophosphatidylcholines were associated with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 14-day post-transplantation (q < 0.05) and were more abundant in recipients undergoing early allograft dysfunction (EAD) (p < 0.05). A receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve combining both lipid levels predicted EAD with 82% accuracy. These findings suggest that LysoPC (16:0) and LysoPC (18:0) might have a role in signalling liver tissue damage due to warm ischemia before transplantation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2045-2322
Volume :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Scientific reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26635289
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17737