Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy and safety of biological agents for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
- Source :
-
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) [Rheumatology (Oxford)] 2016 Apr; Vol. 55 (4), pp. 669-79. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Nov 30. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Objective: To define the optimal biologic agent for systemic JIA (sJIA) based on safety and efficacy data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT).<br />Methods: Through a systematic literature search, sJIA RCTs evaluating biologic agents were identified. The primary efficacy outcome was defined as a 30% improvement according to the modified American College of Rheumatology Paediatric 30 response criteria (JIA ACR30). The primary safety outcome was defined as serious adverse events (SAEs). Outcomes were analysed by pairwise and network meta-analyses. The quality of evidence between biologic agents was assessed by applying the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.<br />Results: From the 493 citations originally identified, 5 RCTs were eligible for inclusion-one each for anakinra, canakinumab and tocilizumab and two for rilonacept: all vs placebo. While all were effective, the network meta-analysis indicated with low-quality evidence (due to indirect comparison and inconsistency) that rilonacept-treated patients were less likely to respond than those treated with canakinumab [odds ratio (OR) 0.10 (95% CI 0.02, 0.38), P = 0.001] or tocilizumab [OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.03, 0.44), P = 0.001]. Risks of SAEs were similar among the biologic agents (supported by very low-quality evidence) and not different from placebo.<br />Conclusion: Despite heterogeneous eligibility criteria and study designs across the five studies and different modified JIA ACR30 criteria, this meta-analysis of short-term RCTs presents empirical evidence that canakinumab and tocilizumab are more effective than rilonacept. Biologic agents in sJIA seem safe and comparable with respect to SAE risk in the short term.<br /> (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Subjects :
- Antibodies, Monoclonal adverse effects
Antibodies, Monoclonal therapeutic use
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use
Antirheumatic Agents adverse effects
Biological Products adverse effects
Humans
Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein adverse effects
Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein therapeutic use
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recombinant Fusion Proteins adverse effects
Recombinant Fusion Proteins therapeutic use
Antirheumatic Agents therapeutic use
Arthritis, Juvenile drug therapy
Biological Products therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1462-0332
- Volume :
- 55
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26628580
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev382