Back to Search Start Over

Clinical Sensitivity of Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Panels in a Diverse Population.

Authors :
Hughes EE
Stevens CF
Saavedra-Matiz CA
Tavakoli NP
Krein LM
Parker A
Zhang Z
Maloney B
Vogel B
DeCelie-Germana J
Kier C
Anbar RD
Berdella MN
Comber PG
Dozor AJ
Goetz DM
Guida L Jr
Kattan M
Ting A
Voter KZ
van Roey P
Caggana M
Kay DM
Source :
Human mutation [Hum Mutat] 2016 Feb; Vol. 37 (2), pp. 201-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Dec 02.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Infants are screened for cystic fibrosis (CF) in New York State (NYS) using an IRT-DNA algorithm. The purpose of this study was to validate and assess clinical validity of the US FDA-cleared Illumina MiSeqDx CF 139-Variant Assay (139-VA) in the diverse NYS CF population. The study included 439 infants with CF identified via newborn screening (NBS) from 2002 to 2012. All had been screened using the Abbott Molecular CF Genotyping Assay or the Hologic InPlex CF Molecular Test. All with CF and zero or one mutation were tested using the 139-VA. DNA extracted from dried blood spots was reliably and accurately genotyped using the 139-VA. Sixty-three additional mutations were identified. Clinical sensitivity of three panels ranged from 76.2% (23 mutations recommended for screening by ACMG/ACOG) to 79.7% (current NYS 39-mutation InPlex panel), up to 86.0% for the 139-VA. For all, sensitivity was highest in Whites and lowest in the Black population. Although the sample size was small, there was a nearly 20% increase in sensitivity for the Black CF population using the 139-VA (68.2%) over the ACMG/ACOG and InPlex panels (both 50.0%). Overall, the 139-VA is more sensitive than other commercially available panels, and could be considered for NBS, clinical, or research laboratories conducting CF screening.<br /> (© 2015 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1098-1004
Volume :
37
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Human mutation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26538069
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22927