Start Over

Comparison Between Dysport and Prosigne in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia.

Authors :: Barbosa PM
Rodrigues GR
de Oliveira DS
de Souza CP
Tumas V
Source :: Clinical neuropharmacology [Clin Neuropharmacol] 2015 Nov-Dec; Vol. 38 (6), pp. 221-6.
Publication Year :: 2015
Abstract: Unlabelled: Cervical dystonia is the most frequent type of primary focal dystonia and treatment with botulinum toxin (BTX) is currently the criterion standard.<br />Objective: In this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of the following 2 formulations of BTXs available in Brazil: abobotulinumtoxin A (Dysport) and Lanzhou BTX type A (Prosigne), during a follow-up of 13 months.<br />Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double blind trial with 1 group being treated with Dysport and the other with Prosigne.<br />Results: Fourteen patients were randomized to receive Dysport and 20 patients to receive Prosigne, each patient was followed during 13 months and received 5 injections of BTX in this period. The dose equivalency used was 3 U of Dysport for 1 U of Prosigne. After each treatment session, we assessed improvement with the Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change scale and asked about adverse effects and duration of improvement. We also used the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) before and after the first and fifth treatment sessions. After the first injection, mean TWSTRS values reduced 12.78 points in the Dysport group and 9.98 in the Prosigne group (P = 0.38). After the last injection, the reduction in TWSTRS values was 11.87 points for Dysport and 11.35 points for Prosigne (P = 0.86).<br />Conclusions: Our data showed similar efficacy and safety profiles when comparing both toxins in the treatment of cervical dystonia.