Back to Search
Start Over
[The Problems with Domestic Introduction of rTMS from the Three Viewpoints of Scientific Evidence, Specialty and Social Responsibility].
- Source :
-
Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica [Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi] 2015; Vol. 117 (2), pp. 126-31. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- The domestic introduction of rTMS is expected as a new treatment option for treatment-resistant depression. I discussed some problems with the introduction from three viewpoints : scientific evidence, specialty, and social responsibility. I surveyed scientific evidence for rTMS regarding the action mechanism, effectiveness, side effects, and its positioning in the treatment guidelines. To secure the quality of rTMS treatment, I proposed rTMS guidelines, nurturing of the specialists, and a center hospital plan, and pointed out some medium-term problems after its introduction and the consistency of rTMS treatment and standard depression treatment. From the viewpoint of social responsibility, rTMS treatment should be a medical service covered by health insurance to avoid its misuse. We should prepare to overcome the public suspicion of brain stimulation treatment for mental disease.
Details
- Language :
- Japanese
- ISSN :
- 0033-2658
- Volume :
- 117
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26514052