Back to Search
Start Over
Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid-Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease.
- Source :
-
Journal of the American Heart Association [J Am Heart Assoc] 2015 Oct 20; Vol. 4 (10), pp. e001675. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Oct 20. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease may not achieve adequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering on statin monotherapy, attributed partly to atherogenic dyslipidemia. More intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy can be considered for these patients. A previous randomized, controlled study demonstrated greater LDL-C lowering in diabetic patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease who switched from simvastatin 20 mg (S20) or atorvastatin 10 mg (A10) to combination ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg (ES10/20) therapy, compared with statin dose-doubling (to S40 or A20) or switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg (R10). The effect of these regimens on novel biomarkers of atherogenic dyslipidemia (low- and high-density lipoprotein particle number and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 [Lp-PLA2]) was assessed.<br />Methods and Results: Treatment effects on low- and high-density lipoprotein particle number (by NMR) and Lp-PLA2 (by ELISA) were evaluated using plasma samples available from 358 subjects in the study. Switching to ES10/20 reduced low-density lipoprotein-particle number numerically more than did statin dose-doubling and was comparable with R10 (-133.3, -94.4, and -56.3 nmol/L, respectively; P>0.05). Increases in high-density lipoprotein particle number were significantly greater with switches to ES10/20 versus statin dose-doubling (1.5 and -0.5 μmol/L; P<0.05) and comparable with R10 (0.7 μmol/L; P>0.05). Percentages of patients attaining low-density lipoprotein particle number levels <990 nmol/L were 62.4% for ES10/20, 54.1% for statin dose-doubling, and 57.0% for R10. Switching to ES10/20 reduced Lp-PLA2 activity significantly more than did statin dose-doubling (-28.0 versus -3.8 nmol/min per mL, P<0.05) and was comparable with R10 (-28.0 versus -18.6 nmol/min per mL; P>0.05); effects on Lp-PLA2 concentration were modest.<br />Conclusions: In diabetic patients with dyslipidemia, switching from statins to combination ES10/20 therapy generally improved lipoprotein subclass profile and Lp-PLA2 activity more than did statin dose-doubling and was comparable with R10, consistent with its lipid effects.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00862251.<br /> (© 2015 The Authors. [Ngoc‐Anh Le and Peter W. F. Wilson] and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. All rights reserved. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.)
- Subjects :
- 1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine Esterase blood
Aged
Biomarkers blood
Cardiovascular Diseases diagnosis
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 diagnosis
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 diagnosis
Double-Blind Method
Dyslipidemias blood
Dyslipidemias complications
Dyslipidemias diagnosis
Europe
Ezetimibe, Simvastatin Drug Combination adverse effects
Female
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
South America
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
Cardiovascular Diseases etiology
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 complications
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 complications
Drug Substitution
Dyslipidemias drug therapy
Ezetimibe, Simvastatin Drug Combination administration & dosage
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors administration & dosage
Lipoproteins blood
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2047-9980
- Volume :
- 4
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of the American Heart Association
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26486166
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001675