Back to Search Start Over

Propranolol in the treatment of infantile haemangiomas: lessons from the European Propranolol In the Treatment of Complicated Haemangiomas (PITCH) Taskforce survey.

Authors :
Wedgeworth E
Glover M
Irvine AD
Neri I
Baselga E
Clayton TH
Beattie PE
Bjerre JV
Burrows NP
Foelster-Holst R
Hedelund L
Hernandez-Martin A
Audrain H
Bhate K
Brown SJ
Baryschpolec S
Darne S
Durack A
Dvorakova V
Gach J
Goldstraw N
Goodyear H
Grabczynska S
Greenblatt D
Halpern J
Hearn RM
Hoey S
Hughes B
Jayaraj R
Johansson EK
Lam M
Leech S
O'Regan GM
Morrison D
Porter W
Ramesh R
Schill T
Shaw L
Taylor AE
Taylor R
Thomson J
Tiffin P
Tsakok M
Janmohamed SR
Laguda B
McPherson T
Oranje AP
Patrizi A
Ravenscroft JC
Shahidullah H
Solman L
Svensson A
Wahlgren CF
Hoeger PH
Flohr C
Source :
The British journal of dermatology [Br J Dermatol] 2016 Mar; Vol. 174 (3), pp. 594-601. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Dec 26.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: Oral propranolol is widely prescribed as first-line treatment for infantile haemangiomas (IHs). Anecdotally, prescribing practice differs widely between centres.<br />Objectives: The Propranolol In the Treatment of Complicated Haemangiomas (PITCH) Taskforce was founded to establish patterns of use of propranolol in IHs.<br />Methods: Participating centres entered data on all of their patients who had completed treatment with oral propranolol for IHs, using an online data capture tool.<br />Results: The study cohort comprised 1097 children from 39 centres in eight European countries. 76·1% were female and 92·8% had a focal IH, with the remainder showing a segmental, multifocal or indeterminate pattern. The main indications for treatment were periocular location (29·3%), risk of cosmetic disfigurement (21·1%) and ulceration and bleeding (20·6%). In total 69·2% of patients were titrated up to a maintenance regimen, which consisted of 2 mg kg(-1) per day (85·8%) in the majority of cases. 91·4% of patients had an excellent or good response to treatment. Rebound growth occurred in 14·1% upon stopping, of whom 53·9% were restarted and treatment response was recaptured in 91·6% of cases. While there was no significant difference in the treatment response, comparing a daily maintenance dose of < 2 mg kg(-1) vs. 2 mg kg(-1) vs. > 2 mg kg(-1) , the risk of adverse events was significantly higher: odds ratio (OR) 1 vs. adjusted OR 0·70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·33-1·50, P = 0·36 vs. OR 2·38, 95% CI 1·04-5·46, P = 0·04, Ptrend < 0·001.<br />Conclusions: The PITCH survey summarizes the use of oral propranolol across 39 European centres, in a variety of IH phases, and could be used to inform treatment guidelines and the design of an interventional study.<br /> (© 2015 British Association of Dermatologists.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1365-2133
Volume :
174
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The British journal of dermatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26473312
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14233