Back to Search
Start Over
Reducing contact forces in the arch and supra-aortic vessels using the Magellan robot.
- Source :
-
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2016 Nov; Vol. 64 (5), pp. 1422-1432. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Sep 18. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Objective: Conventional catheter manipulation in the arch and supra-aortic trunks carries a risk of cerebral embolization. This study proposes a platform for detailed quantitative analysis of contact forces (CF) exerted on the vasculature, in order to investigate the potential advantages of robotic navigation.<br />Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom representing a type I bovine arch was mounted and coupled onto a force/torque sensor. Three-axis force readings provided an average root-mean-square modulus, indicating the total forces exerted on the phantom. Each of the left subclavian, left common carotid, and right common carotid arteries was cannulated within a simulated endovascular suite with conventional (n = 42) vs robotic techniques (n = 30) by two operator groups: experts and novices. The procedure path was divided into three phases, and performance metrics corresponding to mean and maximum forces, force impact over time, standard deviation of forces, and number of significant catheter contacts with the arterial wall were extracted.<br />Results: Overall, median CF were reduced from 1.20 N (interquartile range [IQR], 0.98-1.56 N) to 0.31 N (IQR, 0.26-0.40 N; P < .001) for the right common carotid artery; 1.59 N (IQR, 1.11-1.85 N) to 0.33 N (IQR, 0.29-0.43 N; P < .001) for the left common carotid artery; and 0.84 N (IQR, 0.47-1.08 N) to 0.10 N (IQR, 0.07-0.17 N; P < .001) for the left subclavian artery. Robotic navigation resulted in significant reductions for the mean and maximum forces for each procedural phase. Significant improvements were also seen in other metrics, particularly at the target vessel ostium and for the more anatomically challenging procedural phases. Force reductions using robotic technology were evident for both novice and expert groups.<br />Conclusions: Robotic navigation can potentially reduce CF and catheter-tissue contact points in an in vitro model, by enhancing catheter stability and control during endovascular manipulation.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aorta, Thoracic abnormalities
Aorta, Thoracic physiopathology
Catheterization, Peripheral adverse effects
Clinical Competence
Embolism etiology
Embolism physiopathology
Endovascular Procedures adverse effects
Equipment Design
Humans
Models, Anatomic
Motor Skills
Risk Factors
Robotic Surgical Procedures adverse effects
Stress, Mechanical
Stroke etiology
Stroke physiopathology
Task Performance and Analysis
Time Factors
Torque
Aorta, Thoracic surgery
Catheterization, Peripheral instrumentation
Embolism prevention & control
Endovascular Procedures instrumentation
Robotic Surgical Procedures instrumentation
Stroke prevention & control
Vascular Access Devices
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6809
- Volume :
- 64
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26386511
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.06.215