Back to Search Start Over

The Frequency and Prognostic Impact of Pathological Microscopic Vascular Invasion According to Tumor Size in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors :
Shimada Y
Saji H
Kato Y
Kudo Y
Maeda J
Yoshida K
Hagiwara M
Matsubayashi J
Kakihana M
Kajiwara N
Ohira T
Ikeda N
Source :
Chest [Chest] 2016 Mar; Vol. 149 (3), pp. 775-85. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jan 12.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: Microscopic vascular invasion (MVI) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported to be a strong predictor of poor outcomes but it has not been a descriptor of the TNM classification. The purposes of this study were to determine whether the presence of MVI is related to a predictor of poor outcomes and to explore the degree of MVI according to tumor size.<br />Methods: A total of 1,884 patients with stage pT1-4N0-2 NSCLC who underwent complete resection comprised the study sample. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free proportion were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess independent predictors of poor outcomes.<br />Results: Of 1,884 patients, 1,097 (58.2%) had MVI. Multivariate analysis showed MVI was a significant independent predictor of unfavorable OS (hazard ratio, 1.666; P < .001) and recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.268; P < .001). The frequency of MVI varied according to tumor size, and in each cohort of tumor sizes ≤ 2 cm, > 2 to 3 cm, and > 3 to 5 cm, there were significant differences in survival outcome by MVI status. The proportions of patients with a 5-year recurrence-free period with tumor sizes ≤ 2 cm, > 2 to 3 cm, and > 3 to 5 cm between MVI (+) and MVI (-) were 93.0% and 72.5% (P < .001), 90.8% and 63.3% (P < .001), and 86.4% and 59.9% (P < .001), respectively.<br />Conclusions: This study demonstrated that MVI was a strong predictor of poor outcomes and that the effect is more prominent in patients with tumor sizes ≤ 5 cm. Further analysis of survival and MVI should be collected for future revision of the TNM system.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1931-3543
Volume :
149
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Chest
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26379115
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.15-0559