Back to Search Start Over

Report on ISCTM Consensus Meeting on Clinical Assessment of Response to Treatment of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia.

Authors :
Keefe RS
Haig GM
Marder SR
Harvey PD
Dunayevich E
Medalia A
Davidson M
Lombardo I
Bowie CR
Buchanan RW
Bugarski-Kirola D
Carpenter WT
Csernansky JT
Dago PL
Durand DM
Frese FJ
Goff DC
Gold JM
Hooker CI
Kopelowicz A
Loebel A
McGurk SR
Opler LA
Pinkham AE
Stern RG
Source :
Schizophrenia bulletin [Schizophr Bull] 2016 Jan; Vol. 42 (1), pp. 19-33. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Sep 11.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

If treatments for cognitive impairment are to be utilized successfully, clinicians must be able to determine whether they are effective and which patients should receive them. In order to develop consensus on these issues, the International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology (ISCTM) held a meeting of experts on March 20, 2014, in Washington, DC. Consensus was reached on several important issues. Cognitive impairment and functional disability were viewed as equally important treatment targets. The group supported the notion that sufficient data are not available to exclude patients from available treatments on the basis of age, severity of cognitive impairment, severity of positive symptoms, or the potential to benefit functionally from treatment. The group reached consensus that cognitive remediation is likely to provide substantial benefits in combination with procognitive medications, although a substantial minority believed that medications can be administered without nonpharmacological therapy. There was little consensus on the best methods for assessing cognitive change in clinical practice. Some participants supported the view that performance-based measures are essential for measurement of cognitive change; others pointed to their cost and time requirements as evidence of impracticality. Interview-based measures of cognitive and functional change were viewed as more practical, but lacking validity without informant involvement or frequent contact from clinicians. The lack of consensus on assessment methods was viewed as attributable to differences in experience and education among key stakeholders and significant gaps in available empirical data. Research on the reliability, validity, sensitivity, and practicality of competing methods will facilitate consensus.<br /> (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1745-1701
Volume :
42
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Schizophrenia bulletin
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26362273
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbv111