Cite
Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
MLA
Engstrøm, Thomas, et al. “Complete Revascularisation versus Treatment of the Culprit Lesion Only in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): An Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial.” Lancet (London, England), vol. 386, no. 9994, Aug. 2015, pp. 665–71. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60648-1.
APA
Engstrøm, T., Kelbæk, H., Helqvist, S., Høfsten, D. E., Kløvgaard, L., Holmvang, L., Jørgensen, E., Pedersen, F., Saunamäki, K., Clemmensen, P., De Backer, O., Ravkilde, J., Tilsted, H.-H., Villadsen, A. B., Aarøe, J., Jensen, S. E., Raungaard, B., & Køber, L. (2015). Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England), 386(9994), 665–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60648-1
Chicago
Engstrøm, Thomas, Henning Kelbæk, Steffen Helqvist, Dan Eik Høfsten, Lene Kløvgaard, Lene Holmvang, Erik Jørgensen, et al. 2015. “Complete Revascularisation versus Treatment of the Culprit Lesion Only in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): An Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial.” Lancet (London, England) 386 (9994): 665–71. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60648-1.