Back to Search Start Over

Preoperative predictors and outcomes of right ventricular assist device implantation after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors :
Patil NP
Mohite PN
Sabashnikov A
Dhar D
Weymann A
Zeriouh M
Hards R
Hedger M
De Robertis F
Bahrami T
Amrani M
Rahman-Haley S
Banner NR
Popov AF
Simon AR
Source :
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery [J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg] 2015 Dec; Vol. 150 (6), pp. 1651-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Aug 01.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Objective: The outcomes of ventricular assist device therapy remain limited by right ventricular failure. We sought to define the predictors and evaluate the outcomes of right ventricular failure requiring right ventricular assist device support after long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.<br />Methods: Records of all continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients for the last 10 years were analyzed, including patients on preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and short-term ventricular assist device support. Perioperative clinical, echocardiographic, hemodynamic, and laboratory data of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients requiring right ventricular assist device support (right ventricular assist device group) were compared with the rest of the patient cohort (control group).<br />Results: Between July 2003 and June 2013, 152 patients underwent continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge to transplantation. The overall postoperative incidence of right ventricular assist device support was 23.02% (n = 35). Right ventricular assist device implantation did not significantly affect eventual transplantation (P = .784) or longer-term survival (P = .870). Preoperative right ventricular diameter (P < .001), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (P < .001), previous sternotomy (P = .002), preoperative short-term mechanical support (P = .005), left atrial diameter (P = .014), female gender (P = .020), age (P = .027), and preoperative bilirubin levels (P = .031) were univariate predictors of right ventricular assist device implantation. Multivariate analysis revealed lesser tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (P = .013; odds ratio, 0.613; 95% confidence interval, 0.417-0.901) and smaller left atrial diameter (P = .007; odds ratio, 0.818; 95% confidence interval, 0.707-0.947) as independent predictors of right ventricular assist device implantation. Receiver operating characteristic curve of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion yielded an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.781-0.923), with cutoff tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion less than 12.5 mm having 84% sensitivity and 75% specificity.<br />Conclusions: Lesser tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and smaller left atrial diameter are independent predictors of the need for right ventricular assist device support after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. Right ventricular assist device implantation does not adversely affect eventual transplantation or survival after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-685X
Volume :
150
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26318358
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.090