Back to Search Start Over

Whole Body MRI in the Staging of Esophageal Cancer--A Prospective Comparison with Whole Body 18F-FDG PET-CT.

Authors :
Malik V
Harmon M
Johnston C
Fagan AJ
Claxton Z
Ravi N
O'Toole D
Muldoon C
Keogan M
Reynolds JV
Meaney JF
Source :
Digestive surgery [Dig Surg] 2015; Vol. 32 (5), pp. 397-408. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Aug 26.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: Positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) is established in the staging of esophageal cancer. In this study, an MRI protocol was designed to emulate the anatomical (T1-weighed (T1W) and T2W imaging) and functional information (diffusion-weighted imaging) provided by PET-CT.<br />Methods: In all, 49 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus underwent PET-CT and whole-body MRI (WBMRI). WBMRI was carried out using dedicated sequences tailored to detect metastatic disease at each area corresponding to the anatomical coverage of PET-CT. Nodal status was determined from histopathology and endoscopic ultrasound biopsy (EUS).<br />Results: PET-CT and WBMRI identified the primary tumor in 46/49 (94%) and 48/49 (98%) patients, respectively. Nodal analysis in patients undergoing surgery (n = 18) yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of 27, 100, 100, 47 and 56% for PET-CT, compared with 30, 100, 100, 53 and 61% for WBMRI. When nodal analysis included both surgical specimens and EUS criteria (n = 39), sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 46, 91, 93, 40 and 59% for PET-CT compared with 59, 92, 94, 50 and 67% for WBMRI. Both imaging modalities identified distant metastases in 2 patients.<br />Conclusion: WBMRI has similar accuracy to PET-CT in detecting the primary tumor, nodal deposits and for exclusion of systemic metastatic disease.<br /> (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1421-9883
Volume :
32
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Digestive surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26315570
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000431292