Back to Search
Start Over
Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Trial With Prospective Classification by ATM Protein Level to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Olaparib Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer.
- Source :
-
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2015 Nov 20; Vol. 33 (33), pp. 3858-65. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Aug 17. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Gastric cancer cell lines, particularly those with low levels of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), a key activator of DNA damage response, are sensitive to the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib. We compared the efficacy of olaparib plus paclitaxel (olaparib/paclitaxel) with paclitaxel alone in patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer and assessed whether low ATM expression is predictive of improved clinical outcome for olaparib/paclitaxel.<br />Patients and Methods: In this phase II, double-blind study (Study 39; NCT01063517), patients were randomly assigned to oral olaparib 100 mg twice per day (tablets) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2) per day intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle) or placebo plus paclitaxel (placebo/paclitaxel), followed by maintenance monotherapy with olaparib (200 mg twice per day) or placebo. The study population was enriched to 50% for patients with low or undetectable ATM levels (ATMlow). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).<br />Results: One hundred twenty-three of 124 randomly assigned patients received treatment (olaparib/paclitaxel, n = 61; placebo/paclitaxel, n = 62). The screening prevalence of ATMlow patients was 14%. Olaparib/paclitaxel did not lead to a significant improvement in PFS versus placebo/paclitaxel (overall population: hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; median PFS, 3.91 v 3.55 months, respectively; ATMlow population: HR, 0.74; median PFS, 5.29 v 3.68 months, respectively). However, olaparib/paclitaxel significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo/paclitaxel in both the overall population (HR, 0.56; 80% CI, 0.41 to 0.75; P = .005; median OS, 13.1 v 8.3 months, respectively) and the ATMlow population (HR, 0.35; 80% CI, 0.22 to 0.56; P = .002; median OS, not reached v 8.2 months, respectively). Olaparib/paclitaxel was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings.<br />Conclusion: Olaparib/paclitaxel is active in the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer, with a greater OS benefit in ATMlow patients. A phase III trial in this setting is under way.<br /> (© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)
- Subjects :
- Adenocarcinoma classification
Adenocarcinoma mortality
Adenocarcinoma pathology
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects
Biomarkers, Tumor blood
Biopsy, Needle
Disease-Free Survival
Double-Blind Method
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Maximum Tolerated Dose
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local classification
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local mortality
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local parasitology
Paclitaxel administration & dosage
Paclitaxel adverse effects
Phthalazines administration & dosage
Phthalazines adverse effects
Piperazines administration & dosage
Piperazines adverse effects
Proportional Hazards Models
Prospective Studies
Stomach Neoplasms classification
Stomach Neoplasms mortality
Stomach Neoplasms pathology
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Adenocarcinoma drug therapy
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins blood
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy
Stomach Neoplasms drug therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1527-7755
- Volume :
- 33
- Issue :
- 33
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26282658
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.60.0320