Back to Search Start Over

Metabolic profiling of breast cancer: Differences in central metabolism between subtypes of breast cancer cell lines.

Authors :
Willmann L
Schlimpert M
Halbach S
Erbes T
Stickeler E
Kammerer B
Source :
Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences [J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci] 2015 Sep 01; Vol. 1000, pp. 95-104. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jul 14.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Although the concept of aerobic glycolysis in cancer was already reported in the 1930s by Otto Warburg, the understanding of metabolic pathways remains challenging especially due to the heterogeneity of cancer. In consideration of four different time points (1, 2, 4, and 7 days of incubation), GC-MS profiling of metabolites was performed on cell extracts and supernatants of breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231, -453, BT-474) with different sub classification and the breast epithelial cell line MCF-10A. To the exclusion of trypsinization, direct methanolic extraction, cell scraping and cell disruption was executed to obtain central metabolites. Major differences in biochemical pathways have been observed in the breast cancer cell lines compared to the breast epithelial cell line, as well as between the breast cancer cell lines themselves. Characteristics of breast cancer subtypes could be correlated to their individual metabolic profiles. PLS-DA revealed the discrimination of breast cancer cell lines from MCF-10A based on elevated amino acid levels. The observed metabolic signatures have great potential as biomarker for breast cancer as well as an improved understanding of subtype specific phenomenons of breast cancer.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-376X
Volume :
1000
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26218769
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.07.021