Back to Search
Start Over
Endovascular repair of Stanford B aortic dissection using two stent grafts with different sizes.
- Source :
-
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2015 Jul; Vol. 62 (1), pp. 43-8. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Objective: The objective of this study was to introduce a novel strategy for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of Stanford B aortic dissection using two-stent graft implantation (TSI), in which the proximal stent and distal stent with different sizes are sequentially deployed, and to summarize our experience with this technique.<br />Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of 72 consecutive patients (61 men; mean age, 55 ± 7 years; range, 41-67 years) with Stanford type B aortic dissection who underwent TSI treatment between January 2012 and May 2013. Among all patients, 43 (59.7%) involved the infrarenal aorta and 29 (40.3%) involved the whole thoracic and abdominal aorta; mean aortic involvement length was 226 ± 13 mm (range, 182-312 mm). Eight cases were for acute dissection (within 2 weeks from onset of symptoms), 11 cases were for chronic dissection (>3 months after initial dissection), and 53 cases were for subacute dissection (between 2 weeks and 3 months). Twenty-two cases (30.6%) were uncomplicated type and 50 cases (69.4%) were complicated type. Follow-up was performed postoperatively at 1 month, 6 months, and yearly thereafter. Technique success, aorta morphology, and procedure-related complications were evaluated.<br />Results: Technical success was achieved in 100%; 72 pairs of stent grafts (144 thoracic stent grafts) and 10 left subclavian artery chimney stents were used. The mean aortic length coverage by the stent grafts was 197.6 ± 20.3 mm, and mean taper diameter span was 7.5 ± 1.8 mm. All patients were followed up from 6 to 16 months (mean, 10 ± 4 months); 95.8% (69 of 72) had a thrombosed false lumen in the aortic coverage, and the true lumen expanded on average 57% ± 11% (23%-100%). No significant changes were found in aortic diameters of the proximal and distal ends of the two stent grafts and the angles between centerlines of the distal end of the stent and the aorta during follow-up. Procedure-related complications included transient paraplegia (coverage of the left subclavian artery without revascularization and extensive coverage of aorta >220 mm) due to acute spinal cord ischemia (n = 1) and malapposition of the distal stent (primary tear closed, true lumen expansion led to oversize rate insufficient in distal stent diameter; n = 1). No death or malperfusion complications were observed during the perioperative period and follow-up.<br />Conclusions: Short-term outcomes showed TSI to be a flexible and effective approach to accurately repair Stanford B aortic dissection that could potentially address the limitations of currently available stent grafts. Further prospective clinical studies are warranted to evaluate its long-term efficacy.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Acute Disease
Adult
Aged
Aortic Dissection diagnosis
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic diagnosis
Aortography methods
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Chronic Disease
Endovascular Procedures adverse effects
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Prosthesis Design
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Aortic Dissection surgery
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic surgery
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Endovascular Procedures instrumentation
Stents
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6809
- Volume :
- 62
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26115919
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.02.022