Back to Search
Start Over
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with low CHADS2 scores benefit from warfarin therapy according to propensity score matching subanalysis using the J-RHYTHM Registry.
- Source :
-
Thrombosis research [Thromb Res] 2015 Aug; Vol. 136 (2), pp. 267-73. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jun 11. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Introduction: Recently, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced, with increasing use in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, warfarin continues to be widely used and the benefits and risks of warfarin in NVAF patients warrant closer inspection.<br />Materials and Methods: Thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, and total and cardiovascular mortalities were analyzed in 7,406 NVAF patients in the J-RHYTHM Registry from January to July 2009, prior to DOAC introduction. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce the differences in clinical characteristics between non-anticoagulant (n=1002) and warfarin (n=6404) cohorts to reassess warfarin outcomes over 2years.<br />Results: The incidence of thromboembolism was significantly greater in the non-anticoagulant cohort (3.0%) than in the warfarin cohort (1.5%, P<0.001) with less frequent major hemorrhage in the non-anticoagulant cohort (0.8%) than in the warfarin cohort (2.1%, P=0.009). Using propensity score matching, new subsets (n=896 each) were obtained, with matching of the clinical characteristics between warfarin and non-anticoagulant subsets. The warfarin subset had lower risk factors compared with the total warfarin cohort. The incidence of thromboembolism was higher in the non-anticoagulant subset (2.9%) than in the warfarin subset (0.7%, P<0.001). However, major hemorrhage was not significantly different between the two subsets.<br />Conclusions: Although warfarin was associated with a significantly higher incidence of hemorrhage in the unmatched cohorts, propensity score matching revealed that warfarin reduced thromboembolism without a significant increase in hemorrhage in the matched subsets with lower risks. Propensity score matching reduced selection bias and provided rational comparisons although it had indwelling limitations.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anticoagulants administration & dosage
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Registries
Risk Factors
Warfarin administration & dosage
Anticoagulants therapeutic use
Atrial Fibrillation drug therapy
Hemorrhage chemically induced
Propensity Score
Warfarin therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-2472
- Volume :
- 136
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Thrombosis research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 26092429
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2015.06.009