Back to Search Start Over

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with low CHADS2 scores benefit from warfarin therapy according to propensity score matching subanalysis using the J-RHYTHM Registry.

Authors :
Chishaki A
Kumagai N
Takahashi N
Saikawa T
Inoue H
Okumura K
Atarashi H
Yamashita T
Origasa H
Sakurai M
Kawamura Y
Kubota I
Matsumoto K
Kaneko Y
Ogawa S
Aizawa Y
Chinushi M
Kodama I
Watanabe E
Koretsune Y
Okuyama Y
Shimizu A
Igawa O
Bando S
Fukatani M
Source :
Thrombosis research [Thromb Res] 2015 Aug; Vol. 136 (2), pp. 267-73. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jun 11.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced, with increasing use in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, warfarin continues to be widely used and the benefits and risks of warfarin in NVAF patients warrant closer inspection.<br />Materials and Methods: Thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, and total and cardiovascular mortalities were analyzed in 7,406 NVAF patients in the J-RHYTHM Registry from January to July 2009, prior to DOAC introduction. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce the differences in clinical characteristics between non-anticoagulant (n=1002) and warfarin (n=6404) cohorts to reassess warfarin outcomes over 2years.<br />Results: The incidence of thromboembolism was significantly greater in the non-anticoagulant cohort (3.0%) than in the warfarin cohort (1.5%, P<0.001) with less frequent major hemorrhage in the non-anticoagulant cohort (0.8%) than in the warfarin cohort (2.1%, P=0.009). Using propensity score matching, new subsets (n=896 each) were obtained, with matching of the clinical characteristics between warfarin and non-anticoagulant subsets. The warfarin subset had lower risk factors compared with the total warfarin cohort. The incidence of thromboembolism was higher in the non-anticoagulant subset (2.9%) than in the warfarin subset (0.7%, P<0.001). However, major hemorrhage was not significantly different between the two subsets.<br />Conclusions: Although warfarin was associated with a significantly higher incidence of hemorrhage in the unmatched cohorts, propensity score matching revealed that warfarin reduced thromboembolism without a significant increase in hemorrhage in the matched subsets with lower risks. Propensity score matching reduced selection bias and provided rational comparisons although it had indwelling limitations.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-2472
Volume :
136
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Thrombosis research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26092429
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2015.06.009