Back to Search Start Over

Critical analysis of the stringent complete response in multiple myeloma: contribution of sFLC and bone marrow clonality.

Authors :
Martínez-López J
Paiva B
López-Anglada L
Mateos MV
Cedena T
Vidríales MB
Sáez-Gómez MA
Contreras T
Oriol A
Rapado I
Teruel AI
Cordón L
Blanchard MJ
Bengoechea E
Palomera L
de Arriba F
Cueto-Felgueroso C
Orfao A
Bladé J
San Miguel JF
Lahuerta JJ
Source :
Blood [Blood] 2015 Aug 13; Vol. 126 (7), pp. 858-62. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jun 18.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Stringent complete response (sCR) criteria are used in multiple myeloma as a deeper response category compared with CR, but prospective validation is lacking, it is not always clear how evaluation of clonality is performed, and is it not known what the relative clinical influence is of the serum free light chain ratio (sFLCr) and bone marrow (BM) clonality to define more sCR. To clarify this controversy, we focused on 94 patients that reached CR, of which 69 (73%) also fulfilled the sCR criteria. Patients with sCR displayed slightly longer time to progression (median, 62 vs 53 months, respectively; P = .31). On analyzing this contribution to the prognosis of sFLCr or clonality, it was found that the sFLCr does not identify patients in CR at distinct risk; by contrast, low-sensitive multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) immunophenotyping (2 colors), which is equivalent to immunohistochemistry, identifies a small number of patients (5 cases) with high residual tumor burden and dismal outcome; nevertheless, using traditional 4-color MFC, persistent clonal BM disease was detectable in 36% of patients, who, compared with minimal residual disease-negative cases, had a significantly inferior outcome. These results show that the current definition of sCR should be revised.<br /> (© 2015 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1528-0020
Volume :
126
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Blood
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26089396
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-04-638742