Back to Search Start Over

Is supplemental external beam radiation therapy necessary for patients with higher risk prostate cancer treated with 103Pd? Results of two prospective randomized trials.

Authors :
Merrick GS
Wallner KE
Galbreath RW
Butler WM
Fiano R
Orio PF 3rd
Adamovich E
Source :
Brachytherapy [Brachytherapy] 2015 Sep-Oct; Vol. 14 (5), pp. 677-85. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Jun 06.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the necessity and/or dose of supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in conjunction with palladium-103 ((103)Pd) brachytherapy for high-risk prostate cancer patients.<br />Methods and Materials: Trial 44/20 randomized patients to 44 Gy plus 90 Gy (103)Pd vs. 20 Gy with 115 Gy (103)Pd, and the subsequent trial randomized patients to the 20 Gy arm vs. 125 Gy (103)Pd without EBRT (20/0 trial). Eligibility criteria included clinically organ-confined disease with Gleason scores 7-9 and/or a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 10-20 ng/mL. The brachytherapy prescription dose was prescribed to the prostate gland with generous periprostatic margins. Biochemical failure (BF) was defined as a PSA >0.40 ng/mL after nadir. Median Day 0 minimum dose covering 90% of the prostate volume (D90) was >121.0% of the prescription dose. Multiple parameters were evaluated for effect on outcomes.<br />Results: In 44/20 trial, 13-year BF, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall mortality (OM) were 8.2%, 4.0%, and 42.8% vs. 8.0%, 1.0%. and 40.3% for the 44 and 20 Gy arms. In 20/0 trial, 8-year BF, PCSM, and OM were 2.1%, 0%, and 14.4% vs. 3.6%, 0%, and 16.1% in the 20 vs. 0 Gy arms. When stratified by either pretreatment PSA or by Gleason score, supplemental EBRT dose did not impact BF, PCSM, or OM. In multivariate analysis, BF was most closely related to percent positive biopsies and prostate volume. In both trials, patients with biochemically controlled disease had a median PSA of <0.02 ng/mL.<br />Conclusions: With high-quality brachytherapy dose distributions, supplemental EBRT did not influence BF or PCSM for patients with intermediate-risk disease. The number of patients with Gleason score 8-9 was too small to determine the role of supplemental EBRT in that cohort.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-1449
Volume :
14
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Brachytherapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26051802
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2015.05.001