Back to Search
Start Over
A population-based study comparing patterns of care delivery on the quality of care for persons living with HIV in Ontario.
- Source :
-
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2015 May 13; Vol. 5 (5), pp. e007428. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 May 13. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Objectives: Physician specialty is often positively associated with disease-specific outcomes and negatively associated with primary care outcomes for people with chronic conditions. People with HIV have increasing comorbidity arising from antiretroviral therapy (ART) related longevity, making HIV a useful condition to examine shared care models. We used a previously described, theoretically developed shared care framework to assess the impact of care delivery on the quality of care provided.<br />Design: Retrospective population-based observational study from 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2012.<br />Participants: 13 480 patients with HIV and receiving publicly funded healthcare in Ontario were assigned to one of five patterns of care.<br />Outcome Measures: Cancer screening, ART prescribing and healthcare utilisation across models using adjusted multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analyses.<br />Results: Models in which patients had an assigned family physician had higher odds of cancer screening than those in exclusively specialist care (colorectal cancer screening, exclusively primary care adjusted OR (AOR)=3.12, 95% CI (1.90 to 5.13), family physician-dominant co-management AOR=3.39, 95% CI (1.94 to 5.93), specialist-dominant co-management AOR=2.01, 95% CI (1.23 to 3.26)). The odds of having one emergency department visit did not differ among models, although the odds of hospitalisation and HIV-specific hospitalisation were lower among patients who saw exclusively family physicians (AOR=0.23, 95% CI (0.14 to 0.35) and AOR=0.15, 95% CI (0.12 to 0.21)). The odds of antiretroviral prescriptions were lower among models in which patients' HIV care was provided predominantly by family physicians (exclusively primary care AOR=0.15, 95% CI (0.12 to 0.21), family physician-dominant co-management AOR=0.45, 95% CI (0.32 to 0.64)).<br />Conclusions: How care is provided had a potentially important influence on the quality of care delivered. Our key limitation is potential confounding due to the absence of HIV stage measures.<br /> (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis
Comorbidity
Delivery of Health Care organization & administration
Emergency Service, Hospital
Family Practice
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Ontario
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Retrospective Studies
Specialization
Young Adult
Anti-HIV Agents therapeutic use
Colorectal Neoplasms complications
Delivery of Health Care standards
HIV Infections complications
HIV Infections drug therapy
Mass Screening
Primary Health Care organization & administration
Primary Health Care standards
Quality of Health Care
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2044-6055
- Volume :
- 5
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- BMJ open
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25971708
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007428