Back to Search Start Over

Impact of left ventricular conduction defect with or without need for permanent right ventricular pacing on functional and clinical recovery after TAVR.

Authors :
Weber M
Brüggemann E
Schueler R
Momcilovic D
Sinning JM
Ghanem A
Werner N
Grube E
Schiller W
Mellert F
Welz A
Nickenig G
Hammerstingl C
Source :
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society [Clin Res Cardiol] 2015 Nov; Vol. 104 (11), pp. 964-74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 May 13.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular conduction disturbances (VCD) with or without need for pacemaker (PM) implantation are common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Its effect on patients' functional recovery after TAVR is unclear.<br />Methods and Results: 212 patients (Age 80.8 ± 6.4 years, logEuroscore 28.95 ± 17.37 %) underwent TAVR with the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis and completed 9-month follow-up (FU). After TAVR 125 (59 %) patients were diagnosed with VCD. This group consists of 41 (19 %) patients with a new PM after TAVR, 33 (16 %) patients with PM prior TAVR and markedly increased ventricular stimulation rate, 48 (23 %) patients with new LBBB post-TAVR and three (1 %) patients with LBBB prior TAVR. After FU, the presence of VCD alone was associated with worse recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (VCD: LVEFbaseline 51.7 ± 18.2 %, LVEFFU 53.9 ± 13.0 %; p = 0.8; noVCD: LVEFbaseline 53.8 ± 12.9 %, LVEFFU 63.4 ± 10.1 %; p < 0.01) but had no impact on functional outcomes after TAVR (p > 0.05). Especially patients with VCD caused by permanent RV pacing showed worse functional outcomes presenting with higher functional NYHA classes (p < 0.05), and higher NT-proBNP levels (p < 0.05). 20.4 % of patients with need for PM after TAVR remained in NYHA class ≥3, as compared to 5 % of patients without PM (VCD but no PM: 4.7 %, p < 0.001; noVCD: 5.3 %, p < 0.001). VCD with or without need for PM had no impact on survival after FU.<br />Conclusion: The occurrence of VCD after TAVR is common and associated with unfavorable left ventricular functional recovery. However, only the combination of VCD with permanent right ventricular pacing has adverse impact on heart failure-related symptoms after TAVR.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1861-0692
Volume :
104
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25967154
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-015-0865-9