Back to Search
Start Over
WARRIOR-trial - is routine radiography following the 2-week initial follow-up in trauma patients with wrist and ankle fractures necessary: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
- Source :
-
Trials [Trials] 2015 Feb 27; Vol. 16, pp. 66. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Feb 27. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background: Extremity fractures such as wrist and ankle fractures are a common and costly healthcare problem. The management of these fractures depends on fracture type and loss of congruity of the joint, resulting in cast immobilization or operative treatment. Loss of congruity or displacement leading to uneven joint loading, osteoarthritis and an increased probability of a poor functional outcome should be identified within the first 2 weeks post-trauma, based upon radiographs to determine optimal treatment. After this period, routine radiographs are scheduled for monitoring the bone-healing process. Current protocols describe imaging at 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-trauma. However, it is questionable whether routine radiography following the initial follow-up ( 2-weeks post-trauma) is cost effective. The aim of this study is to determine whether a modification of the radiographic follow-up protocol can be conducted with no worse outcome and less cost than the current standard of care for patients with a wrist or ankle fracture.<br />Methods/design: In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, 697 patients aged 18 years or older will be included: 385 wrist fracture- and 312 ankle fracture patients. Patients will be randomized into two groups: Group 1 receives usual care, consisting of radiographs 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-trauma; Group 2 receives radiographs beyond the initial follow-up only when clinically indicated. The primary outcome is the overall extremity-specific function. For wrist fractures, this includes the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score; for the ankle fractures, this includes the Olerud and Molander ankle score. Secondary outcomes include: healthcare cost, the specific function measured with the Patient Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation for wrist fractures and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons foot and ankle questionnaire for ankle fractures, pain-intensity, health-related quality of life, self-perceived recovery, and complications. Both groups will be monitored at 1, 2, and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months.<br />Discussion: This study will provide data on (cost) effectiveness of routine radiography in the follow-up of wrist and ankle fractures, and could pave the way for a change in (inter)national protocols.<br />Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Register NTR4610 , registration date 22 June 2014.
- Subjects :
- Ankle Fractures economics
Ankle Fractures physiopathology
Ankle Fractures therapy
Arthrography economics
Clinical Protocols
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Disability Evaluation
Fracture Healing
Health Care Costs
Humans
Netherlands
Pain Measurement
Predictive Value of Tests
Quality of Life
Recovery of Function
Research Design
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Wrist Injuries economics
Wrist Injuries physiopathology
Wrist Injuries therapy
Ankle Fractures diagnostic imaging
Arthrography methods
Wrist Injuries diagnostic imaging
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1745-6215
- Volume :
- 16
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Trials
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25872504
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0600-x