Back to Search Start Over

Laparoscopic conversion of failed vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion.

Authors :
David MB
Abu-Gazala S
Sadot E
Wasserberg N
Kashtan H
Keidar A
Source :
Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery [Surg Obes Relat Dis] 2015 Sep-Oct; Vol. 11 (5), pp. 1085-91. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Feb 11.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: The Silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (SRVG), a modification of Mason's vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), was the restrictive procedure of choice for many bariatric surgeons. The reoperation rate for failure/complications reported in long-term studies is approximately 50%.<br />Objective: We report our experience in laparoscopic conversion of failed SRVG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD).<br />Setting: A single surgeon's experience at a university-affiliated hospital.<br />Methods: Between March 2006 and April 2014, 39 patients underwent conversion of SRVG to laparoscopic RYGB (n = 25) or BPD (n = 14). The outcomes were retrieved from a prospectively collected database and analyzed.<br />Results: Most (89%) of the conversions were completed laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 195 and 200 min for RYGB and BPD, respectively. There was no mortality. Complications occurred in 11 patients (28%), 5 in RYGB (19%) and 6 in BPD (42%). At the 3-year follow-up, the mean body mass index decreased from 47±8 kg/m(2) to 26±4 kg/m(2) for BPD, and from 43 kg/m(2) to 34 kg/m(2) (P = .05) for RYGB. Weight (kg) decreased from 110 to 84 and to 92, and from 123 to 81 and 68, at 1 and 3 years for RYGB and BPD, respectively.<br />Conclusions: The weight loss for RYGB and BPD was equal at 1 year but tended to be better for BPD at 3 years postoperatively. Laparoscopic conversion of failed VBG to RYGB or BPD was feasible, but it was followed by prohibitively high complication rates in BPD patients. The risk:benefit ratio of these procedures in this series is questionable.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-7533
Volume :
11
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25862185
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.026