Back to Search
Start Over
Assessment of PaO₂/FiO₂ for stratification of patients with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.
- Source :
-
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2015 Mar 27; Vol. 5 (3), pp. e006812. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Mar 27. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Objectives: A recent update of the definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) proposed an empirical classification based on ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO₂/FiO₂) at ARDS onset. Since the proposal did not mandate PaO₂/FiO₂ calculation under standardised ventilator settings (SVS), we hypothesised that a stratification based on baseline PaO₂/FiOv would not provide accurate assessment of lung injury severity.<br />Design: A prospective, multicentre, observational study.<br />Setting: A network of teaching hospitals.<br />Participants: 478 patients with eligible criteria for moderate (100<PaO₂/FiO₂≤200) and severe (PaO₂/FiO₂≤100) ARDS and followed until hospital discharge.<br />Interventions: We examined physiological and ventilator parameters in association with the PaO₂/FiO₂ at ARDS onset, after 24 h of usual care and at 24 h under a SVS. At 24 h, patients were reclassified as severe, moderate, mild (200<PaO₂/FiO₂≤300) ARDS and non-ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂>300).<br />Primary and Secondary Outcomes: Group severity and hospital mortality.<br />Results: At ARDS onset, 173 patients had a PaO₂/FiO₂≤100 but only 38.7% met criteria for severe ARDS at 24 h under SVS. When assessed under SVS, 61.3% of patients with severe ARDS were reclassified as moderate, mild and non-ARDS, while lung severity and hospital mortality changed markedly with every PaO₂/FiO₂ category (p<0.000001). Our model of risk stratification outperformed the stratification using baseline PaO₂/FiO₂ and non-standardised PaO₂/FiO₂ at 24 h, when analysed by the predictive receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: area under the ROC curve for stratification at baseline was 0.583 (95% CI 0.525 to 0.636), 0.605 (95% CI 0.552 to 0.658) at 24 h without SVS and 0.693 (95% CI 0.645 to 0.742) at 24 h under SVS (p<0.000001).<br />Conclusions: Our findings support the need for patient assessment under SVS at 24 h after ARDS onset to assess disease severity, and have implications for the diagnosis and management of ARDS patients.<br />Trial Registration Numbers: NCT00435110 and NCT00736892.<br /> (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Area Under Curve
Blood Gas Analysis
Female
Hospitals, Teaching
Humans
Inhalation
Male
Middle Aged
Partial Pressure
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Prospective Studies
ROC Curve
Respiration, Artificial methods
Respiratory Distress Syndrome mortality
Respiratory Distress Syndrome physiopathology
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome mortality
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome physiopathology
Tidal Volume
Hospital Mortality
Lung physiopathology
Monitoring, Physiologic methods
Oxygen physiology
Respiratory Distress Syndrome diagnosis
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome diagnosis
Severity of Illness Index
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2044-6055
- Volume :
- 5
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- BMJ open
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25818272
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006812