Back to Search Start Over

Control group design, contamination and drop-out in exercise oncology trials: a systematic review.

Authors :
Steins Bisschop CN
Courneya KS
Velthuis MJ
Monninkhof EM
Jones LW
Friedenreich C
van der Wall E
Peeters PH
May AM
Source :
PloS one [PLoS One] 2015 Mar 27; Vol. 10 (3), pp. e0120996. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Mar 27 (Print Publication: 2015).
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Purpose: Important considerations for exercise trials in cancer patients are contamination and differential drop-out among the control group members that might jeopardize the internal validity. This systematic review provides an overview of different control groups design characteristics of exercise-oncology trials and explores the association with contamination and drop-out rates.<br />Methods: Randomized controlled exercise-oncology trials from two Cochrane reviews were included. Additionally, a computer-aided search using Medline (Pubmed), Embase and CINAHL was conducted after completion date of the Cochrane reviews. Eligible studies were classified according to three control group design characteristics: the exercise instruction given to controls before start of the study (exercise allowed or not); and the intervention the control group was offered during (any (e.g., education sessions or telephone contacts) or none) or after (any (e.g., cross-over or exercise instruction) or none) the intervention period. Contamination (yes or no) and excess drop-out rates (i.e., drop-out rate of the control group minus the drop-out rate exercise group) were described according to the three design characteristics of the control group and according to the combinations of these three characteristics; so we additionally made subgroups based on combinations of type and timing of instructions received.<br />Results: 40 exercise-oncology trials were included based on pre-specified eligibility criteria. The lowest contamination (7.1% of studies) and low drop-out rates (excess drop-out rate -4.7±9.2) were found in control groups offered an intervention after the intervention period. When control groups were offered an intervention both during and after the intervention period, contamination (0%) and excess drop-out rates (-10.0±12.8%) were even lower.<br />Conclusions: Control groups receiving an intervention during and after the study intervention period have lower contamination and drop-out rates. The present findings can be considered when designing future exercise-oncology trials.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1932-6203
Volume :
10
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PloS one
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25815479
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120996