Back to Search Start Over

Low recurrence rates for in situ and invasive melanomas using Mohs micrographic surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining: tissue processing methodology to optimize pathologic staging and margin assessment.

Authors :
Etzkorn JR
Sobanko JF
Elenitsas R
Newman JG
Goldbach H
Shin TM
Miller CJ
Source :
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology [J Am Acad Dermatol] 2015 May; Vol. 72 (5), pp. 840-50. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Mar 13.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Background: Various methods of tissue processing have been used to treat melanoma with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS).<br />Objective: We describe a method of treating melanoma with MMS that combines breadloaf frozen sectioning of the central debulking excision with complete peripheral and deep microscopic margin evaluation, allowing detection of upstaging and comprehensive pathologic margin assessment before reconstruction.<br />Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating for local recurrence and upstaging in 614 invasive or in situ melanomas in 577 patients treated with this MMS tissue processing methodology using frozen sections with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining. Follow-up was available in 597 melanomas in 563 patients.<br />Results: Local recurrence was identified in 0.34% (2/597) lesions with a mean follow-up time of 1026 days (2.8 years). Upstaging occurred in 34 of 614 lesions (5.5%), of which 97% (33/34) were detected by the Mohs surgeon before reconstruction.<br />Limitations: Limitations include retrospective study, intermediate follow-up time, and that the recurrence status of 39.6% of patients was self-reported.<br />Conclusion: Treating melanoma with MMS that combines breadloaf sectioning of the central debulking excision with complete peripheral and deep microscopic margin evaluation permits identification of upstaging and consideration of sentinel lymph node biopsy before definitive reconstruction and achieves low local recurrence rates compared with conventional excision.<br /> (Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6787
Volume :
72
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25774012
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.007