Back to Search Start Over

Coronary dominance and prognosis in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter) registry.

Authors :
Gebhard C
Fuchs TA
Stehli J
Gransar H
Berman DS
Budoff MJ
Achenbach S
Al-Mallah M
Andreini D
Cademartiri F
Callister TQ
Chang HJ
Chinnaiyan KM
Chow BJ
Cury RC
Delago A
Gomez MJ
Hadamitzky M
Hausleiter J
Hindoyan N
Feuchtner G
Kim YJ
Leipsic J
Lin FY
Maffei E
Pontone G
Raff G
Shaw LJ
Villines TC
Dunning AM
Min JK
Kaufmann PA
Source :
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging [Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging] 2015 Aug; Vol. 16 (8), pp. 853-62. Date of Electronic Publication: 2015 Mar 04.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Aims: Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has become an important tool for non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary dominance can be assessed by CCTA; however, the predictive value of coronary dominance is controversially discussed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and prognosis of coronary dominance in a large prospective, international multicentre cohort of patients undergoing CCTA.<br />Methods and Results: The study population consisted of 6382 patients with or without CAD (47% females, 53% males, mean age 56.9 ± 12.3 years) who underwent CCTA and were followed over a period of 60 months. Right or left coronary dominance was determined. Right dominance was present in 91% (n = 5817) and left in 9% (n = 565) of the study population. At the end of follow-up, outcome in patients with obstructive CAD (>50% luminal stenosis) and right dominance was similar compared with patients with left dominance [hazard ratio (HR) 0.46, 95% CI 0.16-1.32, P = 0.15]. Furthermore, no differences were observed for the type of coronary dominance in patients with non-obstructive CAD (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.41-2.21, P = 0.8962) or normal coronary arteries (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.68-1.59, P = 0.9). Subgroup analysis in patients with left main disease revealed an elevated hazard of the combined endpoint for left dominance (HR 6.45, 95% CI 1.66-25.0, P = 0.007), but not for right dominance.<br />Conclusion: In our study population, survival after 5 years of follow-up did not differ significantly between patients with left or right coronary dominance. Thus, assessment of coronary vessel dominance by CCTA may not enhance risk stratification in patients with normal coronary arteries or obstructive CAD, but may add prognostic information for specific subpopulations.<br /> (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2047-2412
Volume :
16
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25744341
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu314